p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-'Adalah Equality
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Role of Indonesian Women Ulama Congress (KUPI) in the Search for Gender Equality-Based Islamic Law Faizah, Nur; Rezy Meidina, Ahmad; Lubabul Chadziq, Achmad; Iqbal, Moch.; Umam, M. Shaiful
al-'adalah Vol 21 No 2 (2024): Al-'Adalah
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/adalah.v21i2.23698

Abstract

The Indonesian Women Ulama Congress (KUPI) is an important milestone in integrating the principles of gender equality into the discourse of Islamic law in Indonesia. This Congress not only reflects women's leadership in religious studies but also offers strategies to respond to the challenges of gender inequality that are often legitimized through the interpretation of Islamic law. This study aims to analyze the role of KUPI in developing gender equality strategies through a contextual methodological approach based on maqāshid al-sharīa. This research is classified as qualitative research with a phenomenological approach. Data were collected through document analysis, participant observation, and in-depth interviews with KUPI figures. The analysis combined a critical perspective on societal patriarchal structures and a hermeneutic approach to interpreting religious texts. The results of the study indicate that there are three strategic approaches that KUPI can fight for in fighting for gender equality, namely: (1) reinterpretation of Islamic law that is inclusive of gender issues; (2) community-based advocacy; and (3) strengthening the ulama network. This study concludes that KUPI plays a key role in building a more just Islamic legal paradigm that is not only rooted in Islamic tradition but also in line with human rights principles
Telaah Kitab al-Mustashfa dan Maslahah Mursalah al-Ghazali Lubabul Chadziq, Achmad
Journal Of Gender, Child And Humanity Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Equality: Journal of Gender, Child and Humanity
Publisher : PSGA Institut Agama Islam Tarbiyatut Tholabah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58518/equality.v2i1.3307

Abstract

This study aims to examine the monumental work Al-Mustashfa by Imam Al-Ghazali in the discipline of ushul fiqh, particularly in the context of the discussion on maslahah mursalah. The primary focus of this research is to understand how Imam Al-Ghazali structured this book by combining rational (philosophical) and textual (scriptural) methods, as it was composed using the methodology of scholars of ilm kalam or the Shafi’i school. The study also concentrates on Al-Ghazali’s perspective on maslahah mursalah.This research employs a descriptive-analytical method. The study finds that Imam Al-Ghazali, in writing Al-Mustashfa, uses the term istislah to refer to maslahah mursalah. He categorizes it among weak arguments (dalil-dalil) leading scholars to differing perceptions about whether Al-Ghazali regarded maslahah mursalah as authoritative evidence (hujjah). However, upon a more comprehensive analysis of his works on ushul fiqh, it can be concluded that he considered it a valid hujjah under the condition that it does not contradict the Qur'an, Hadith, or consensus (ijma), and aligns with the objectives of Islamic law (maqasid shari’ah). These conditions have led scholars to argue that maslahah mursalah, according to Al-Ghazali, is a non-independent proof (dalil ghair mutaqillah), but its application closely resembles qiyas.