Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Post-Constitutional Court Ruling Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023: The Impact On Trade Unions And Worker Protection In Semiconductor Manufacturing Edrick Edwardina Effendy; Mohammad Ahmad Eko Susilo
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.5504

Abstract

The Constitutional Court's Decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023 concerning the testing of the Job Creation Law has had a significant impact on various aspects of employment in Indonesia, including the protection of workers' rights and the role of trade unions in strategic industries. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of the Constitutional Court's decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023 on industrial relations between workers and entrepreneurs in the semiconductor manufacturing sector in Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study design to analyze the impact of the Constitutional Court's decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023 on labor unions and worker protection in the semiconductor manufacturing sector. The results of this study show that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023 provides more flexibility for employers in regulating employment, which has an impact on the tension of industrial relations between workers and employers, especially related to the increase in workload and reduced protection of workers' rights. This can be seen from data that shows a decline in workers' trust in trade unions and an increase in dissatisfaction with working conditions. Although unions have great potential in protecting workers' rights, they face major challenges in increasing member participation and their relevance to workers' needs. Employers who neglect worker welfare risk lower employee retention and productivity, while companies that care about worker welfare show more positive relationships with unions as well as better stability. The government also plays an important role in creating a balanced labor policy, prioritizing the welfare of workers without neglecting flexibility for employers
Pengaturan Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT) Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Jesica Christi; Edrick Edwardina Effendy
Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/cerdika.v6i2.2956

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konsep dan kepastian hukum hubungan kerja berdasarkan Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT) pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif melalui studi kepustakaan. Data yang dianalisis meliputi bahan hukum primer seperti peraturan perundang-undangan dan putusan MK, serta bahan sekunder berupa literatur hukum ketenagakerjaan yang relevan. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis isi dan interpretasi hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan MK No. 168/PUU-XXI/2023 telah memberikan kejelasan dan pembatasan signifikan terhadap pelaksanaan PKWT. Putusan tersebut menegaskan bahwa PKWT hanya berlaku untuk pekerjaan tertentu yang bersifat sementara, musiman, atau terkait produk baru, dengan jangka waktu maksimal lima tahun termasuk perpanjangan. Selain itu, putusan ini memperkuat aspek perlindungan pekerja dengan mewajibkan pencatatan PKWT kepada dinas ketenagakerjaan dan pemberian uang ganti rugi saat berakhirnya hubungan kerja. Kesimpulan penelitian adalah Putusan MK telah meningkatkan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan bagi pekerja PKWT dengan membatasi ruang lingkup dan durasi perjanjian, serta mempertegas kewajiban hukum pengusaha. Implikasinya, pemerintah dan DPR perlu segera menyusun regulasi ketenagakerjaan yang lebih komprehensif dan terpisah dari UU Cipta Kerja guna mengakomodasi mandat konstitusional dari Mahkamah Konstitusi.