Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Journal of Law and Social Politics
Edrick Edwardina Effendy
Universitas Pelita Harapan
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Post-Constitutional Court Ruling Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023: The Impact On Trade Unions And Worker Protection In Semiconductor Manufacturing Edrick Edwardina Effendy; Mohammad Ahmad Eko Susilo
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.5504

Abstract

The Constitutional Court's Decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023 concerning the testing of the Job Creation Law has had a significant impact on various aspects of employment in Indonesia, including the protection of workers' rights and the role of trade unions in strategic industries. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of the Constitutional Court's decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023 on industrial relations between workers and entrepreneurs in the semiconductor manufacturing sector in Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study design to analyze the impact of the Constitutional Court's decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023 on labor unions and worker protection in the semiconductor manufacturing sector. The results of this study show that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023 provides more flexibility for employers in regulating employment, which has an impact on the tension of industrial relations between workers and employers, especially related to the increase in workload and reduced protection of workers' rights. This can be seen from data that shows a decline in workers' trust in trade unions and an increase in dissatisfaction with working conditions. Although unions have great potential in protecting workers' rights, they face major challenges in increasing member participation and their relevance to workers' needs. Employers who neglect worker welfare risk lower employee retention and productivity, while companies that care about worker welfare show more positive relationships with unions as well as better stability. The government also plays an important role in creating a balanced labor policy, prioritizing the welfare of workers without neglecting flexibility for employers
Pengaturan Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT) Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Jesica Christi; Edrick Edwardina Effendy
Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/cerdika.v6i2.2956

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konsep dan kepastian hukum hubungan kerja berdasarkan Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT) pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif melalui studi kepustakaan. Data yang dianalisis meliputi bahan hukum primer seperti peraturan perundang-undangan dan putusan MK, serta bahan sekunder berupa literatur hukum ketenagakerjaan yang relevan. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis isi dan interpretasi hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan MK No. 168/PUU-XXI/2023 telah memberikan kejelasan dan pembatasan signifikan terhadap pelaksanaan PKWT. Putusan tersebut menegaskan bahwa PKWT hanya berlaku untuk pekerjaan tertentu yang bersifat sementara, musiman, atau terkait produk baru, dengan jangka waktu maksimal lima tahun termasuk perpanjangan. Selain itu, putusan ini memperkuat aspek perlindungan pekerja dengan mewajibkan pencatatan PKWT kepada dinas ketenagakerjaan dan pemberian uang ganti rugi saat berakhirnya hubungan kerja. Kesimpulan penelitian adalah Putusan MK telah meningkatkan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan bagi pekerja PKWT dengan membatasi ruang lingkup dan durasi perjanjian, serta mempertegas kewajiban hukum pengusaha. Implikasinya, pemerintah dan DPR perlu segera menyusun regulasi ketenagakerjaan yang lebih komprehensif dan terpisah dari UU Cipta Kerja guna mengakomodasi mandat konstitusional dari Mahkamah Konstitusi.
The Dual Legal Status of Developers in Buy-Back Guarantee–Based Subrogation: A Juridical Analysis of Mortgage Property Execution Involving Land Certificates Registered in the Developer’s Name Edrick Edwardina Effendy; Rizky Pratama Putri
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i4.176

Abstract

Background: The increasing utilization of Kredit Pemilikan Rumah (KPR) schemes in Indonesia has generated complex legal relationships among consumers, banks, and property developers, particularly within Buy Back Guarantee (BBG) arrangements. Legal disputes emerge when debtors experience default while land certificates remain registered under developers’ names, and developers settle debtor obligations through BBG mechanisms. Through subrogation, developers may obtain creditor positions while maintaining formal ownership, creating uncertainty regarding unilateral cancellation of Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB), property repossession, and enforcement of rights over financed assets. Objective: This study examines the legality of unilateral PPJB cancellation and property repossession conducted by developers based on subrogation deeds, as well as the legal consequences arising from the dual position of developers as formal property owners and substituted creditors. Methods: This research applies a normative juridical approach using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials consist of primary legal sources, secondary legal literature, and judicial decisions related to mortgage financing, subrogation, PPJB, and BBG mechanisms. Results: The findings indicate that subrogation does not automatically grant developers the authority to unilaterally cancel PPJBs or repossess properties without fulfilling contractual obligations and applicable legal procedures. The developer’s role as a substituted creditor must be separated from its capacity as the registered owner of the property. Conclusion: Legal certainty in KPR practices requires compliance with good faith principles, judicial oversight, and clear contractual arrangements regarding default and subrogation consequences. This study contributes to strengthening legal understanding of the relationship between property rights, contractual obligations, and creditor protection in Indonesian housing financing.
Legal Certainty and the Position of Driver-Partners in the Digital Platform Ecosystem Edrick Edwardina Effendy; Awang Fahrizal
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i4.186

Abstract

Background:The rapid growth of online ride-hailing platforms in Indonesia has produced millions of driver-partners whose working arrangements do not fully align with existing legal categories. Prevailing debate tends to frame platform partners within an employment relationship under Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower. This study argues that such an approach is conceptually flawed, since not all elements of an employment relationship, particularly wages and command/subordination, are cumulatively satisfied in the partner-platform relation. Methods:Using a normative juridical method with conceptual, statutory, and comparative approaches, this article demonstrates that digital platform partners are, in fact, more accurately constructed as micro-business actors as defined under Law Number 20 of 2008 on MSMEs, given that they own their own operational assets, provide services directly to consumers, are free to accept or reject orders, and independently bear business risk. Results:The implication of this reconstruction is that MSME regulation, particularly Government Regulation Number 7 of 2021 and existing partnership schemes, offers a more relevant legal basis for protecting platform partners than the Manpower Law. Conclusion:The article concludes by formulating a direction for ius constituendum, namely the need to recognize the category of "platform partner" as a sub-category of micro-business actor equipped with minimum social security and fair partnership standards
Certainty and Legal Protection of SHMSRS Holders Due to the Refusal to Extend or Renew the Right to Use Shared Land Mohammad Ilham Riyadi; Hafiz Akbar; Edrick Edwardina Effendy
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i4.187

Abstract

Background: The development of vertical housing in Indonesia has increased the need for legal certainty for holders of Apartment Ownership Certificates (SHMSRS). Problems arise because SHMSRS do not stand alone but are instead embedded in joint rights to common areas, common objects, and common land. Objective: This study examines the epistemological shift from human judgment to algorithmic knowledge in the implementation of Financial Accounting Standards (SAK) and Quality Management Systems (SMM). Drawing on positivism, interpretivism, and pragmatism, it explores whether AI-generated outputs constitute valid accounting knowledge or merely computational representations of professional judgment. Methods: This study employs a qualitative-interpretive approach through conceptual analysis and examination of practitioners’ perspectives on the reliability, transparency, explainability, and trustworthiness of AI-assisted decision-making. Results: The findings show that AI enhances efficiency, predictive accuracy, and analytical capabilities in accounting and auditing. However, its application also creates epistemological challenges, including limited algorithmic transparency, reduced explainability, and the potential weakening of professional skepticism. The shift from assessment-based expertise to data-driven inferential knowledge alters the traditional epistemic authority of accountants and auditors. The implementation of SAK and SMM consequently requires clearer professional responsibility, human oversight, and accountability to maintain the quality of financial reporting and audit processes. Conclusion: Legal protection needs to be built through preventive and repressive mechanisms, namely the obligation for transparency of land status by developers, strengthening of PPJB clauses, the role of notaries and PPAT, government supervision, access to consumer dispute resolution, and proportional compensation mechanisms if unit owners suffer losses.
Co-Authors Awang Fahrizal Hafiz Akbar Jesica Christi Mohammad Ahmad Eko Susilo Mohammad Ilham Riyadi Rizky Pratama Putri