Nur Rochaeti
Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Politics and Green Financial Crime: Envisioning a Sustainable Democratic Future in Indonesia Yagie Sagita Putra; Pujiyono Pujiyono; Nur Rochaeti; Zico Junius Fernando
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 24 No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2024.24.3.15576

Abstract

The Indonesian Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK) in Indonesia has uncovered a significant issue concerning illegal financial transactions linked to environmental crimes. They have identified that approximately 1 trillion Rupiah, obtained from such green financial crimes, is being funnelled into political parties for the 2024 elections. This discovery is particularly alarming, as it raises serious concerns about the integrity of the democratic process and the sustainability of the nation's political future. The PPATK's findings indicate that this illegal funding comes from various environmental crimes, including illegal logging and other environmentally damaging activities. The fact that these funds are being used to finance political campaigns implies a deeply concerning intersection between environmental crime and political corruption. This situation exemplifies a broader category of 'green financial crime', where environmental exploitation is directly linked to illicit financial gains. Results This research investigates the implications of these financial irregularities for the country's commitment to environmental conservation and the development of green policies. It discusses the broader implications for Indonesia's democratic order and urges a re-evaluation of current political funding mechanisms, advocating for transparent and accountable practices to ensure electoral integrity and promote a sustainable democratic future. The importance of collective action, involving civil society, policymakers, and international partners, to address the linkages between politics, democracy, and green financial crime ultimately protects Indonesia's democratic values and environmental heritage.
Contempt of Court in Renewal of Indonesian Criminal Law Based on Pancasila M Musmuliadin; Erlyn Indarti; Nur Rochaeti
Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The act of harassment against the administration of justice is not new. However, these acts have been happening more frequently since the freer reform era. Actions and situations that occur in court such as obstructing and making noise during the trial process can be said to be Contempt of Court ("CoC") acts. CoC does not only apply to those who are not court officials but also applies to court officials in carrying out their duties and obligations. To see and analyze the Contempt of Court issue, it is necessary to know how the criminal law policy is in tackling offenses against the administration of this judiciary and how the concept of the Draft Criminal Code regulates it. To answer this question, in Point 4 Elucidation of Law No. 14 of 1985 the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has stated the need for regulation regarding the Contempt of Court through legislation. court officials themselves. In the Indonesian criminal law, the Contempt of Court has not been specifically regulated and the arrangements are scattered in several provisions of the Criminal Code article. However, in the context of reforming criminal law, especially in the Draft Criminal Code, the Contempt of Court is regulated in a separate chapter and formulated as a Crime Against Judicial Process which is a legal effort to defend the public interest and the rule of law so that the judicial process can be carried out fairly and fairly, without being disturbed. , influenced or undermined by other parties, both during the judicial process in court and outside the court building.