p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kajian Bali
Nanang Sutrisno
Universitas Udayana, Bali, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tri Lulu: Community Resistance to Source-Based Waste Management Policies in Badung Regency Bali Anak Agung Gede Agung Dalem; Anak Agung Ngurah Anom Kumbara; Nanang Sutrisno; Maria Matildis Banda
Jurnal Kajian Bali (Journal of Bali Studies) Vol 14 No 2 (2024): Reclaiming Cultural Heritage
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Bali Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JKB.2024.v14.i02.p10

Abstract

Bali encounters a waste emergency due to the amplification in the type and volume of the population’s waste. The Bali government has initiated community resistance, particularly in Badung Regency, Bali. This study aims to critically reflect on this circumstance from the lens of the qualitative method using a cultural studies approach. Field research was performed by implementing the critical ethnography model. The study reveals that community resistance is categorized into three waste management dimensions called Tri Lulu, i.e., individual and public resistance, hyperregulation conflict, and disruption of local concepts. Individual and public resistance, both open and covert, reflects the failure of dialogue between subjective awareness and regulative practice in finding practical solutions. Hyperregulation in waste management causes policies to overlap and triggers conflicts of interest. Local concepts are disrupted due to increasing pressure on demographic and economic infrastructure. Pentahelix synergy is required to implement waste management policies in Bali.
Udayana School of Kajian Budaya compared to the Spell of British Cultural Studies: Critical Discourses in Debate A A Ngurah Anom Kumbara; Mayske Rinny Liando; Ida Bagus Gde Putra; Nanang Sutrisno
Jurnal Kajian Bali (Journal of Bali Studies) Vol 14 No 2 (2024): Reclaiming Cultural Heritage
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Bali Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JKB.2024.v14.i02.p13

Abstract

This article attempts to look deeper into the Udayana School of Kajian Budaya compared to the spell of British Cultural Studies to understand both modes and critical discourses in debate. It hopes to widen the horizon on the plurality of cultural studies versions existing beyond Britain, the United States and Europe; specifically the Udayana School of Kajian Budaya in Bali and broadly in Indonesia. Hence, the authors conducted a literature search to compile relevant publications, interviewed Kajian Budaya lecturers and alumni, and employed critical interpretive analysis to the data. The study indicates formation of the British and the Udayana School variants were influenced by critical theory of the Frankfurt School and postmodernism ideas of French and American thinkers, which critiqued institutions of modernity, capitalist society, positivism in scientific inquiry, ‘classical’ enlightenment thought, and the culture industry. However, the Udayana School of Kajian Budaya exhibits distinctiveness in its study areas, approach and paradigm.