Said, Muhamad Helmi Md
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Public's Right to Sports Competition Without Match Fixing: Between Honorable Interest and Offence Rusdiana, Emmilia; Madjid, Abdul; Istiqomah, Milda; Said, Muhamad Helmi Md
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v7n1.p98-123

Abstract

Sports competitions are a strategic forum for achievement, investment, and even noble values, but they are increasingly shrouded in match-fixing allegations. Arrangements regarding match fixing have not been regulated in their norms, so law enforcement and the government enforce the law without any basis. On the other hand, the government has the authority to take preventive measures before determining the cause of match fixing as an important study. This study examines the philosophy of alleged score fixing based on the function of criminal law based on legal interests in determining an adequate legal framework. The type of research is normative juridical based on a conceptual and comparative approach. This paper proves and confirms that score fixing violates the honor of the integrity of the state. Furthermore, efficient sports competitions with adequate industry revenues are important for the state. Based on this research, score fixing prevention is restoring the urgency of criminal law with the interest of honor in the form of state integrity, namely by restoring proper law enforcement
Impacts of Revising Criminal Wrongful Convictions on Judicial Credibility in China: A Cocktail Party Effect Analysis Said, Muhamad Helmi Md; Li, Yaoyao; Hassan, Muhamad Sayuti; Liu, Jingyu; Tinuk Dwi Cahyani
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): January, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i1.11046

Abstract

In the Disruption Era, the revision of criminal wrongful convictions is vital to the protection of human rights. Moreover, it has a wide and profound impact on judicial credibility with complex mechanisms for shaping such impact. This commitment to rectify errors and uphold justice through criminal revision, while commendable, is overshadowed by a prevailing public perception that attributes such revisions to systemic deficiencies such as corruption, misuse of authority, and biased judicial decisions. This study delves into the intricate landscape of rectifying wrongful convictions by introducing the nuanced perspective of the Cocktail Party Effect (CPE), a sophisticated acoustic theory. The CPE's impact unfolds in three distinct stages—aptly termed "Screen-Mask-Polarize"—as the public navigates through the revision process. At its core, this study elucidates how signals emanate from wrongful conviction revisions to undergo automatic screening, influenced by the public's subjective preferences, thereby establishing a biased negative cognitive context. This cognitive bias, in turn, possesses the potential to erode public trust in the legal system and diminish confidence in the judiciary. Consequently, this comprehensive research offers insightful recommendations for judicial organs, the news media, and the public, complemented by two instrumental measures: the implementation of a state compensation system and the establishment of an accountability framework for wrongful convictions. The overarching goal of this study is to empower the public with the tools needed for a more objective and logical analysis of wrongful conviction revisions, fostering a nuanced understanding and trust in the criminal justice system.