Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 18 Documents
Search

Book Review: The International Law on Foreign Investment Maulana, Mursal
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 5, No 2 (2018): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (161.512 KB)

Abstract

Professor M. Sornarajah, prominent scholar in the field of investment law and C. J Koh Professor at Faculty of Law of the National University of Singapore presents his ambitious work on the contemporary issues on foreign investment in the context of public international law. Whatever criticism might land on Sornarajah’s ears in regard to this work, The International Law on Foreign Investment is undoubtedly an excellent work and one of the most remarkable publication.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v5n2.a11
How International law Work A Rational Choice Theory Maulana, Mursal
Padjadjaran Journal of International Law Vol 1, No 1 (2017): PJIL Volume 1, Number 1, January 2017
Publisher : Padjadjaran Journal of International Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (243.16 KB)

Abstract

BOOK RIVIEWTitle                    : How International law Work                             A Rational Choice TheoryAuthor                 : Andrew T GuzmanPublisher             : Oxford University Press Does international law affect state behavior?. Why would states pay any attention to international law in the absence of coercive enforcement mechanism?. What do we mean when we say international law is “binding”, given that states can almost always to violate it?. These intriguing and philosophical questions raised by the author to make sure that we had grasped at least one answer. If not, we were failed to understand the nature of international law. These question also remains us about traditional debate between proponent and opponent of international law such as Hobbes, Spinoza and Austin. But, in the 21st Century we are not debating or neglecting the existence of international law anymore.
BOOK REVIEW: HOW INTERNATIONAL LAW WORK A RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY Mursal Maulana
Padjadjaran Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017): Padjadjaran Journal of International Law, Volume 1, Number 1, January 2017
Publisher : International Law Department, Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/pjil.v1i1.280

Abstract

Does international law affect state behavior?. Why would states pay any attention to international law in the absence of coercive enforcement mechanism?. What do we mean when we say international law is “binding”, given that states can almost always to violate it?. These intriguing and philosophical questions raised by the author to make sure that we had grasped at least one answer. If not, we were failed to understand the nature of international law. These question also remains us about traditional debate between proponent and opponent of international law such as Hobbes, Spinoza and Austin. But, in the 21st Century we are not debating or neglecting the existence of international law anymore.Written by Andrew T. Guzman who is recently serving as dean of The University of Southern California Gould School of Law (USC Gould), this book develops a persuasive explanation of why and when international law works by using rational choice perspective. Although previously there are some authors focusing their study on this topic such as Professor Abraham Chayes and Antonia Handler Chayes in their book “The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreement” which uses managerial approach in describing the compliance of international law and Professor Thomas Franck in his book “Fairness in International Law and Institution” which explains why states comply with international law by introducing fairness approach, this book offers better perspective in understanding international law in contemporary development by proposing “Rational Choice Theory”. The theory then is developed into “Three Rs of Compliance” (Reputation, Reciprocity and Retaliation). The book tries to explain how international law is able to affect state behavior despite a lack of coercive enforcement mechanism.
Book Review: The International Law on Foreign Investment Mursal Maulana
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 5, No 2 (2018): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (161.512 KB)

Abstract

Professor M. Sornarajah, prominent scholar in the field of investment law and C. J Koh Professor at Faculty of Law of the National University of Singapore presents his ambitious work on the contemporary issues on foreign investment in the context of public international law. Whatever criticism might land on Sornarajah’s ears in regard to this work, The International Law on Foreign Investment is undoubtedly an excellent work and one of the most remarkable publication.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v5n2.a11
The Need for Involving Third Parties in Dealing with ASEAN’s Marine Debris Problem Idris Idris; Achmad Gusman Catur Siswandi; Arfin Sudirman; Amanda Yola Elvarina Sipahutar; Mursal Maulana
Balobe Law Journal Volume 2 Issue 2, October 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/balobe.v2i2.1002

Abstract

Introduction: Marine debris has been a major problem towards ASEAN environment for the past decade, with several of its member state becoming the largest sources of marine derbis globally. The article presents three main causes of marine debris and reviewing how and to what extend ASEAN has attempted to stop or prevent the continuation of these causes.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to see whether main causes of ASEAN Marine Debris has already been tackled by ASEAN frameworks and policies, while also taking a third-party recommendation for consideration.Methods of the Research: This research was contucted using a normative juridical approach by examining literature studies or secondary data related to the research objects.Results of the Research: The result of this paper is that there is still a gap between the main causes of marine debris in ASEAN and the solution and steps planned out within ASEAN frameworks, which need to be filled with further research and study, conducted by ASEAN with collaboration from third parties.
Legal Cooperation in the ASEAN Maritime Environment in the Free Trade Era: Its Implication for Indonesia Idris Idris; Arfin Sudirman; Mursal Maulana; Amanda Yola
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 8 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v8i3.3591

Abstract

For the past 30 years, an estimated 50 percent of the coral reef population has declined as a result of overfishing, pollution, coastal development, and climate change. Such decline risks jeopardizing livelihoods and the capacity for disaster risk reduction, as well as endangering marine biodiversity. With the emergence of free trade and the high mobility of modern ships, trade goods all over the world are increasingly affected by marine pollution. Since 1992, at least 600,000 tons of oil have entered the oceans each year, primarily from normal shipping operations, accidents, and illegal discharges, which contribute to more pollution than does offshore oil and gas exploitation. Recognizing the differentiation of circumstances in each maritime area, current international law, including that in Southeast Asia, regulates the framework of marine environment protection in cooperation with other states and other international organizations. Unfortunately, because the Association of Southeast Asian Nations framework does wield binding power, its declarations have yet to create significant improvements to the region’s marine environment. This paper discusses the urgency to create a new binding regulation within Association of Southeast Asian Nations that would obligate its Member States to actively protect the region’s marine environment.
The Need for ASEAN Environmental Maritime Security Cooperations Arfin Sudirman; Idris; Yasmin Prisella Rabbani; Mursal Maulana; Yusa Djuyandi
PERSPEKTIF Vol. 12 No. 3 (2023): PERSPEKTIF, July
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/perspektif.v12i3.9226

Abstract

Environmental problems are increasingly worrying in the South East Asia region. These environmental problems are found in the mainland and the marine environment, from climate change, oil spills to debris and marine pollution. ASEAN has a significant role in facilitating collaborations and dialogues between member countries to protect the marine environment. This article examines ASEAN's effort as a regional organization to protect the marine environment from environmental security's perspective in the maritime sector. This article analyzes with C. Lamont’s qualitative method along with in-depth interview with source from CSIS, ASEAN Environmental Division, and researcher. This article argues that ASEAN acknowledges the nature of ecological security poses and, therefore, intra- and inter-regional cooperation is essential.  However, ASEAN has not implemented practical cooperation because the ASEAN chairmanship system still focuses on traditional issues such as politics, security, and economy rather than the marine environment. Furthermore, due to the non-intervention principle, ASEAN has not provided binding legal instruments for ASEAN member countries since no particular body can apply legal force to all ASEAN member countries.
IMPLEMENTASI KETENTUAN COUNTER-OFFER BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIF UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS (2016) DAN BUKU III KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA Syifa Adila; Laina Rafianti; Mursal Maulana
Hakim Vol 1 No 3 (2023): Agustus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/hakim.v1i3.1236

Abstract

Sebagai negara anggota UNIDROIT, Indonesia diharapkan untuk dapat membuat kontrak internasional sesuai standar internasional. Mengadopsi standar internasional akan memberikan kemudahan bagi para pihak berkontrak terutama antara pihak Indonesia dengan pihak asing. Seperti yang telah dikodifikasi dalam Unidroit Principles on Internantional Commercial Contracts (2016) (“UPICC”), terdapat tahapan Counter Offer atau Penawaran Balik yang memperbolehkan para pihak untuk membalas Tawaran dengan modifikasi secara materil. Penawaran Balik jelas diatur dalam Pasal 2.1.11 UPICC dan umum dipraktikkan di negara-negara anggota UNIDROIT baik dalam membuat kontrak nasional ataupun kontrak internasional. Sebagai negara anggota UNIDROIT, Indonesia tidak mengatur mengenai prosedur Penawaran Balik. Kekosongan hukum pengaturan Penawaran Balik ini telah menimbulkan miskomunikasi dan kekeliruan dengan pihak asing terkait mekanisme perubahan materil yang benar. Tentunya bagi para pihak asing, kekeliruan yang timbul karena ketidakpahaman Penawaran Balik oleh pihak Indonesia dapat dimanfaatkan secara sepihak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah deskriptif analitis dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif, yaitu mengkaji dan meneliti data primer yang terdiri atas KUHPerdata dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, dan data sekunder yang terdiri atas kasus hukum dan literatur yang memuat teori-teori hukum dan praktik pelaksanaan hukum positif mengenai pokok permasalahan di atas. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian yang ingin dicapai dalam tulisan ini, adalah adanya implementasi serta pemahaman komprehensif terkait ketentuan Counter Offer terutama dalam membentuk kontrak dengan pihak asing. Peneliti menyarankan agar kontrak yang dibuat dengan pihak asing tidak hanya disesuaikan dengan ketentuan Counter Offer dalam UPICC, tetapi juga disesuaikan dengan aturan Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata.
PENINGKATAN LITERASI ANAK SEKOLAH DASAR MELALUI CERITA LEGENDA NUSANTARA DENGAN ANALISIS FISHBONE Rafan Darodjat; Aam Suryamah; Mursal Maulana
Midang Vol 1, No 3 (2023): Midang: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, Oktober 2023
Publisher : Unpad Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/midang.v1i3.50251

Abstract

Perkembangan zaman membuat adanya perubahan nilai sosial, diakibatkan oleh kemajuan teknologi informasi dan modernisasi. Pengaruh perkembangan tersebut mengakibatkan lunturnya nilai-nilai budaya dan kurang mengetahui kekayaan sastra yang dimiliki bangsa Indonesia, yaitu cerita legenda. Peningkatan literasi harus diawali sejak dini sebagai upaya peningkatan minat baca dan kemampuan mengolah informasi menjadi bermanfaat. Pengenalan cerita legenda sebagai gerbang untuk menarik minat baca dan penerapan analisis fishbone sebagai metode yang dapat digunakan dalam memahami konteks suatu bacaan. Hasil dari kegiatan pengabdian ini, bahwasanya pengenalan cerita legenda harus diperkenalkan sejak dini sebagai upaya pengurangan terhadap aktivitas penggunaan gadget dan peningkatan literasi bagi anak usia sekolah dasar.
Arbitrase Blockchain dalam Prinsip Kerahasiaan dan Ketidakberpihakan: Lex Digitalis Arbitri Shiddiq, Naufal; Budhijanto, Danrivanto; Maulana, Mursal
Unram Law Review Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Unram Law Review(ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ulrev.v8i1.339

Abstract

Kleros blockchain arbitration presents a promising solution for faster, more cost-effective, and more secure arbitration in digital environment. However, it comes with significant challenges; confidentiality and impartiality. Arbitration is often chosen due to its confidentiality. Examining Kleros’ blockchain arbitration, it becomes apparent that the platform lacks of confidentiality regime and therefore raising a number of probable issues. The anonymity of Kleros jurors complicates the matters, makes it challenging to establish trust, legally bind jurors, monitor compliance, and address potential jurors’ misconduct. Additionally, jurors’ anonymity prohibits disclosure of pertinent information, which may  rise  justifiable doubts, thereby resulting in jurors’ impartiality are questioned. Therefore, this article advocates for Kleros to reconsider their strict anonymity policy and to introduce confidentiality and impartiality provisions in order to align more with the established legal practices in digital arbitration environment (Lex Digitalis Arbitri).