Dahlan, A. Fahmi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

IDEOLOGY, VALUES AND NORMS IN HIP-HOP COMMUNITY WIJILAN YOGYAKARTA: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY Dahlan, A. Fahmi; Adi, Ida Rochani
Rubikon : Journal of Transnational American Studies Vol 12, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Pengkajian Amerika, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/rubikon.v12i1.101571

Abstract

This research explores the cultural adaptation of American hip-hop in Wijilan, Yogyakarta, focusing on the dynamics of hybridity between global and local cultures. Hip-hop, originally rooted in the Bronx during the 1970s, has become a global cultural force that merges with various traditions worldwide. In Wijilan, the hip-hop community has blended the individualistic values of American hip-hop with the Javanese collective ethos of gotong royong. This fusion results in unique artistic expressions. Using ethnographic methods, this study reveals hip-hop's role as an ideology through identity formation, resistance, cultural expression, and social commentary within communities by observing practices, exploring identity, highlighting resistance, interpreting symbols, and assessing impact. Events, like Soringin Hip-hop Festival, highlight the role of hip-hop as a platform for cultural exchange and social commentary, showcasing a blend of music, graffiti, and dance that embodies both local and global influences. The study concludes that the cultural hybridity in Wijilan’s hip-hop community fosters a new, dynamic identity that maintains traditional values while embracing contemporary, global trends, contributing to both cultural preservation and innovation.
Reduksionisme Vs Holisme dalam Membentuk Opini Publik tentang Kebijakan Hak Senjata: Analisis Komparatif Partai-Partai Politik Utama Amerika: Reduksionisme Vs Holisme dalam Membentuk Opini Publik tentang Kebijakan Hak Senjata: Analisis Komparatif Partai-Partai Politik Utama Amerika Dahlan, A. Fahmi
Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jfi.v8i3.93514

Abstract

The debate over gun ownership rights in the United States remains one of the most polarized political issues, reflecting fundamentally different worldviews between Republicans and Democrats. These divergent perspectives can be traced to philosophical orientations that shape both policy design and public discourse. This study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining analysis of policy documents, media coverage, and political messaging, to investigate how reductionist and holistic frameworks influence gun rights debates over the past two decades. Drawing on Risjord’s conceptualization, reductionism is understood as an approach that isolates specific factors, prioritizes individual rights, and advances narrowly targeted interventions. Within the American political context, Republicans often embrace this framework, emphasizing the Second Amendment as the central guarantee of personal liberty and self-defense. In contrast, holism emphasizes the interconnectedness of social systems and advocates comprehensive solutions that address root causes. Democrats frequently adopt this orientation, framing gun violence as a public health crisis that requires systemic reforms addressing poverty, inequality, and mental health. The findings reveal that reductionist discourse tends to construct gun rights as a constitutional and individual security issue, while holistic discourse frames gun violence as a collective challenge embedded in broader social structures. This contrast highlights how deeply ingrained philosophical orientations shape political communication and public opinion. Importantly, the study identifies areas of overlap that may inform more effective, unified approaches to firearm policy in the United States.