Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kappa Journal JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
Fadila, Jihan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Astronomy Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Konstruksi Hukum Pembuktian Penuntut Umum Terhadap Sonny Widjaja Dalam Kasus Korupsi PT. ASABRI Fadila, Jihan; Alfitra, Alfitra
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 6, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.40666

Abstract

Evidence is crucial to the criminal process, especially in corruption cases. This study analyzes the strength of the evidence presented by the Public Prosecutor in the corruption case of the reconstruction of investment funds of PT. ASABRI with Sonny Widjaja's response. The focus of this study is to assess the extent to which the evidence meets the elements of a crime as regulated in Article 2, paragraph (1) of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption. This study uses a normative method with a statutory regulatory approach and a case approach. The study results indicate that the Public Prosecutor proved the elements unlawful, enriching oneself or others and causing losses to state finances with a loss value of Rp22.78 trillion. The evidence was carried out through five main pieces of evidence, namely witness statements, expert statements, letters, statements from prostitutes, and clues, including electronic evidence. The Panel of Judges accepted the evidence and declared the perpetrator guilty based on the primary charge, thus imposing a prison sentence of 18 years and a fine of Rp750 million. This study confirms that a strong evidentiary strategy by the Public Prosecutor plays an essential role in shaping the judge's conviction and upholding justice in large-scale corruption cases.
Pemetaan Potensi Wilayah Bencana Longsor Menggunakan Aplikasi SIG (Sistem Informasi Geografi) di Kabupaten Lebak Fadila, Jihan; Ruhiat, Yayat; Haryadi, Rudi
Kappa Journal Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Universitas Hamzanwadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29408/kpj.v9i2.29973

Abstract

Kabupaten Lebak merupakan daerah yang sering mengalami tanah longsor, dikarenakan keadaan morfologinya yang beragam di antaranya dataran, perbukitan curam dengan kemiringan <25% (landai, bergelombang, terjal), dan gunung/pengunungan. Kondisi geologi dan litologi curah hujan tahunan di Kabupaten Lebak cukup tinggi berkisar antara 2.000 - >4000 mm/tahun. Pada penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah curah hujan, kemiringan lereng, jenis tanah, dan penggunaan lahan dapat mempengaruhi terjadinya wilayah bencana longsor serta pemetaan potensi wilayah longsor di Kabupaten Lebak, dengan melakukan pemetaan daerah mana saja yang termasuk kedalam tingkat bahaya bencana longsor dan menggunakan Sistem Informasi Geografis (SIG) untuk membuat peta menggunakan analisis spasial dengan metode skoring, pembobotan (Complete Mapping Analysis) dan Overlay. Peta rawanlongsor merupakan tumpang susun (overlay) antara peta curah hujan, kemiringan lereng, jenis tanah, dan penggunaan lahan. Kelas yang digunakan pada peta rawan longsor, diklasifikasikan menjadi 3 kelas diantaranya rendah, sedang, dan tinggi. Hasil yang diperoleh dari peta rawan longsor, yaitu tingkat kerawanan rendah dengan luas 65986.09 Ha (20.42%), tingkat kerawanan sedang dengan luas 245928.92 Ha (76,1%), dan tingkat kerawanan tinggi dengan luas 11262.20 Ha (3.48%).
Konstruksi Hukum Pembuktian Penuntut Umum Terhadap Sonny Widjaja Dalam Kasus Korupsi PT. ASABRI Fadila, Jihan; Alfitra, Alfitra
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.40666

Abstract

Evidence is crucial to the criminal process, especially in corruption cases. This study analyzes the strength of the evidence presented by the Public Prosecutor in the corruption case of the reconstruction of investment funds of PT. ASABRI with Sonny Widjaja's response. The focus of this study is to assess the extent to which the evidence meets the elements of a crime as regulated in Article 2, paragraph (1) of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption. This study uses a normative method with a statutory regulatory approach and a case approach. The study results indicate that the Public Prosecutor proved the elements unlawful, enriching oneself or others and causing losses to state finances with a loss value of Rp22.78 trillion. The evidence was carried out through five main pieces of evidence, namely witness statements, expert statements, letters, statements from prostitutes, and clues, including electronic evidence. The Panel of Judges accepted the evidence and declared the perpetrator guilty based on the primary charge, thus imposing a prison sentence of 18 years and a fine of Rp750 million. This study confirms that a strong evidentiary strategy by the Public Prosecutor plays an essential role in shaping the judge's conviction and upholding justice in large-scale corruption cases.
Co-Authors Alfitra Alfitra, Alfitra Rudi Haryadi, Rudi Yayat Ruhiat