Pradiani, Canisya
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Ringan di Meja Hijau, Berat di Nurani: Pelanggaran Kode Etik Hakim dalam Korupsi 271 Triliun Harvey Moeis dan Runtuhnya Kepercayaan Publik M, Mulyadi; Pradiani, Canisya; Sagita, Nabila; Al Hafizh, Muhammad Fadhlan; Alfarizi, Rizqie Achmad; Y. S, Jevon Verrell; Ginting, Yovani Yolanda Putri; Putra R, Daffa Charisma
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15161565

Abstract

The corruption case involving Harvey Moeis, with state losses reaching 271 trillion rupiah, has brought sharp scrutiny to the integrity and professionalism of judges in Indonesia. The public's perception of a lenient verdict has triggered allegations of violations of the judicial code of ethics, potentially undermining public trust in the judiciary. This study aims to analyze in depth the alleged violations of the judicial code of ethics in this case, as well as its impact on public trust. The research method used is a case study with a qualitative approach, through the analysis of documents, news, and literature studies. The results of the study indicate indications of violations of the judicial code of ethics, reflected in the significant disparity between the prosecutor's demands and the judge's verdict. The implications of this case are extensive, not only damaging the image of the judiciary, but also threatening the rule of law and justice in Indonesia.
Protection of Consumer Rights of Pertamax Users Against Fuel Adulting Practices (2018 – 2023) Pradiani, Canisya; Satino, Satino
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v9i1.51451

Abstract

Consumer protection under Indonesian law aims to guarantee the right to security, safety, comfort, and accurate information, as specified in Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Allegations of adulteration of Pertamax by PT Pertamina Patra Niaga and related parties have resulted in losses for consumers and have reduced public confidence in the quality of national fuel. This research uses a qualitative normative legal approach by analyzing legislation, legal doctrine, and expert opinions regarding consumer rights and business actors' obligations. Supporting data from consumer complaint reports compiled by LBH Jakarta and CELIOS is used to a limited extent to strengthen the context of the problem. The results indicate that although the legal framework normatively regulates consumer rights protection, in practice there are still weaknesses in the supervision and fulfillment of business actors' responsibilities, particularly in the energy sector.