Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Osteoprotective and Chondroprotective Effects of Moringa oleifera: A Systematic Literature Review Bagus Gede Krisna Astayogi; Kadek Gede Bakta Giri; I Gede Mahardika Putra
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 6 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v9i6.1316

Abstract

Background: Bone and joint disorders, particularly arthritis and osteoporosis, represent significant global health burdens, often managed with NSAIDs and steroids, which carry potential systemic side effects. Moringa oleifera, a plant rich in bioactive compounds, has emerged as a potential therapeutic alternative due to its reported biological activities, including anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the existing preclinical evidence regarding the osteoprotective (bone-protective) and chondroprotective (cartilage-protective) effects of Moringa oleifera. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases for relevant English-language articles published between 2014 and 2024. Studies investigating the effects of Moringa oleifera extracts on bone or cartilage health in in vivo arthritis or bone defect models were included. Data on study design, intervention details, outcome measures, and key findings related to osteoprotection and chondroprotection were extracted and synthesized qualitatively. Results: Seven preclinical in vivo studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies demonstrated that various extracts of Moringa oleifera (leaf ethanol, aqueous, methanol) exerted significant anti-inflammatory effects, evidenced by reduced paw edema, lower arthritis scores, and decreased inflammatory markers like CRP. Anti-nociceptive effects were also observed. Chondroprotective effects were indicated by improved radiographic scores (reduced joint space narrowing), cartilage regeneration, reduced fibrillation, and preservation of chondrocytes in histopathological analyses. Osteoprotective effects included increased osteoblast numbers, improved trabecular bone microarchitecture, decreased osteoclast numbers, reduced bone resorption, and enhanced bone healing, particularly when combined with marine collagen. Conclusion: Preclinical evidence strongly suggested that Moringa oleifera possesses significant osteoprotective and chondroprotective properties, mediated likely through its anti-inflammatory, anti-nociceptive, antioxidant, and direct cellular effects on bone and cartilage cells. Moringa oleifera holds potential as a supplementary or alternative therapeutic strategy for managing bone and joint diseases like arthritis and osteoporosis, although further rigorous clinical investigation is warranted.
The Osteoprotective and Chondroprotective Effects of Moringa oleifera: A Systematic Literature Review Bagus Gede Krisna Astayogi; Kadek Gede Bakta Giri; I Gede Mahardika Putra
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 9 No. 6 (2025): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v9i6.1316

Abstract

Background: Bone and joint disorders, particularly arthritis and osteoporosis, represent significant global health burdens, often managed with NSAIDs and steroids, which carry potential systemic side effects. Moringa oleifera, a plant rich in bioactive compounds, has emerged as a potential therapeutic alternative due to its reported biological activities, including anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the existing preclinical evidence regarding the osteoprotective (bone-protective) and chondroprotective (cartilage-protective) effects of Moringa oleifera. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases for relevant English-language articles published between 2014 and 2024. Studies investigating the effects of Moringa oleifera extracts on bone or cartilage health in in vivo arthritis or bone defect models were included. Data on study design, intervention details, outcome measures, and key findings related to osteoprotection and chondroprotection were extracted and synthesized qualitatively. Results: Seven preclinical in vivo studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies demonstrated that various extracts of Moringa oleifera (leaf ethanol, aqueous, methanol) exerted significant anti-inflammatory effects, evidenced by reduced paw edema, lower arthritis scores, and decreased inflammatory markers like CRP. Anti-nociceptive effects were also observed. Chondroprotective effects were indicated by improved radiographic scores (reduced joint space narrowing), cartilage regeneration, reduced fibrillation, and preservation of chondrocytes in histopathological analyses. Osteoprotective effects included increased osteoblast numbers, improved trabecular bone microarchitecture, decreased osteoclast numbers, reduced bone resorption, and enhanced bone healing, particularly when combined with marine collagen. Conclusion: Preclinical evidence strongly suggested that Moringa oleifera possesses significant osteoprotective and chondroprotective properties, mediated likely through its anti-inflammatory, anti-nociceptive, antioxidant, and direct cellular effects on bone and cartilage cells. Moringa oleifera holds potential as a supplementary or alternative therapeutic strategy for managing bone and joint diseases like arthritis and osteoporosis, although further rigorous clinical investigation is warranted.
Comparison of Meniscal Tear Location and Zone in Athletes: A Systematic Review of Implications for Return to Sport I Nyoman Gede Witriadnyana; I Wayan Subawa; I Gede Mahardika Putra
The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025): The International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research
Publisher : International Medical Journal Corp. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70070/np55k665

Abstract

Introduction: Meniscal injury represents one of the most prevalent knee injuries observed in the athletic population, carrying a substantial risk of threatening career longevity. The selection between the two primary management strategies—partial meniscectomy or meniscal repair—presents a critical clinical dilemma, balancing the need for rapid recovery against the imperative of preserving long-term joint health. The specific characteristics of the tear, including its anatomical location (medial versus lateral) and its vascularization zone, are recognized as major determinants influencing the final functional outcome. Methods: This systematic review was rigorously executed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed across major electronic databases, including PubMed, Semantic Scholar, Springer, and Google Scholar. The search utilized a detailed set of Boolean keywords targeting the athlete population, meniscal repair interventions, comparisons with meniscectomy and tear location, and return-to-sport outcomes. Following the screening of 6,756 initial records, a total of 32 eligible studies were ultimately included in the final analysis. These studies involved athletes with arthroscopically or radiologically confirmed meniscal tears, explicitly reported recovery outcomes, and utilized appropriate study designs. Results: The findings demonstrate a clear difference in recovery timelines: Meniscectomy consistently enabled athletes to achieve a faster return to sport (RTS), typically within 1 to 4.3 months, compared to the longer duration required for meniscal repair (5.6–7.6 months). Despite this variance in timing, the overall return-to-sport rate was generally comparable between the two procedures, consistently falling within the range of 77% to 93%. Repair of the lateral meniscus is clinically favored due to its inherently superior healing potential. Conversely, the rate of repair failure exhibited significant variation contingent on the tear morphology, reaching up to 27.4% for specific patterns such as bucket-handle tears. The rates at which athletes successfully returned to their pre-injury performance level were broadly distributed (53.9% to 92.6%) and tended to be lower following complex interventions, such as meniscal allograft transplantation. Discussion: The evidence highlights a fundamental trade-off: the rapid functional recovery afforded by meniscectomy contrasts sharply with the long-term joint preservation advantages provided by meniscal repair. The optimal treatment strategy requires meticulous individualization, demanding careful consideration of the specific tear location (with repair strongly advocated for the lateral meniscus), the tear pattern, the athlete’s age, and their professional activity level. Furthermore, the systematic review established that accelerated rehabilitation protocols do not correlate with an increased risk of repair failure, thereby supporting the implementation of earlier functional recovery programs. Conclusion: The clinical management of meniscal tears in athletes should prioritize tissue preservation through meniscal repair whenever technically feasible, particularly in the context of lateral tears and for young athletes. Although this preservation approach mandates a longer period of rehabilitation, it constitutes a vital investment in the athlete’s long-term joint health and the sustainability of their athletic career.