p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal KOLONI Jurnal Agregate
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perhitungan Daya Dukung Fondasi Pada Dinding Penahan Tanah Sungai Wai Malua Desa Wakal Tangmau, Vernandi; Rehatta, Glen Boyke; Latar, Sjafrudin
KOLONI Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): JUNI 2024
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/koloni.v3i2.638

Abstract

Soil retaining wall (DPT) is a construction building that functions as a slope stabilizer that has the possibility of landslides. One of the areas that often experiences landslides is the central Maluku road in Wahatu hamlet, Wakal village. The factor that causes landslides is due to the increase in volume caused by high rainfall which makes the widening of the river flow which results in landslides that seep to the roadside. The planning made is only based on the instincts and work experience of the contractors and plus the pile foundation used only uses the nani wood pile foundation so that the strength and durability of the wooden pile foundation must be calculated so that we can find out whether the plan is safe or not. The results of this study stated that the carrying capacity per pole = 0.784739 kg with a total carrying capacity, the number of poles 12 pieces x 0, 784739 kg = 9.417 kg / 9.5 tons and the total weight of the beronjong is 97.5 tons. From the calculation results can be concluded the weight of gabions > the total carrying capacity of wooden piles, then from the weight difference is 9.5 tons – 97.5 is 88 tons
ANALISIS PRODUKTIVITAS TENAGA KERJA DENGAN METODE WORK SAMPLING PADA PROYEK REHABILITASI DAN RENOVASI LABORATORIUM IAIN AMBON Latuihamallo, Yakob Latuihamallo; Rehatta, Glen Boyke; Gaspersz, Willem
Journal Agregate Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): September
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Sipil

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31959/ja.v2i2.1854

Abstract

Project development nowadays is increasing, but on the other hand, the need for available quality resources is limited. The resources in question are human resources, materials and equipment. One very important factor is labor. If the workforce used is less skilled or not optimal in their work, then the results of the work will be poor. The quality obtained is not good and the productivity is low. The IAIN Ambon Laboratory Rehabilitation and Renovation Project really requires a careful calculation of the productivity of the workforce, so that an appropriate work system and the number of workers needed can be determined so that it can produce products that meet expectations. The analytical method used is the work sampling method where the percentage is obtained from adding effective work to ¼ essential contributory work, then dividing the sum by the total observations. The research results obtained LUR values ​​based on time divided into 2 (two) parts, namely the morning session from 08.00-12.00 and then the afternoon session from 14.00-17.00. The following results were obtained: A). The cleaning work was obtained: (Morning Time) Value Labor Utilization Rate (LUR) (85.21%) effective (82%), essential contributory (11%) and ineffective (7%). (Afternoon time) Labor Utilization Rate (LUR) (82.36%), effective (79%), essential contributor (12%), ineffective (9%). B). The best jobs obtained are: (Morning Time) Labor Utilization Rate (LUR) (90.10%), effective (88%), essential contributory (7%) and ineffective (5%). (Day Time) Labor Utilization Rate (LUR), (86.81%), effective (84%), essential contributor (12%) and ineffective (4%). C). Foundry work obtained: (Morning Time) Labor Utilization Rate (LUR) (86.56), effective (85%), essential contributory (8%) and ineffective (8%). (Day Time) Labor Utilization Rate (LUR) values ​​(87.50%), effective (85%), essential contributory (10%) and ineffective at 5%. From the work sampling results of overall sloof work on sloof work, the following are obtained: Labor Utilization Value Rate (LUR) (86.64%) effective (84%), essential contributory (10%) and ineffective (6%).