Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal La Sociale Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision
Amal, Ridha Haykal
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Implementation of the Role of Ankum and Papera in the Process of Resolving Military Cases in the Jurisdiction Susanto, Arif; Siregar, Taufik; Amal, Ridha Haykal
Journal La Sociale Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Journal La Sociale
Publisher : Borong Newinera Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v6i2.1981

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of the role of Ankum (Superiors Who Have the Right to Sentence) and Papera (Case Submission Officers) in the process of resolving military crime cases in the jurisdiction of the Medan High Military Court I. The approach used is qualitative with descriptive-analytical methods through in-depth interviews, document studies, and observations. The focus of the research includes three main aspects, namely the case administration process in the military judicial environment, the application of fast, precise, and simple judicial principles after the integration of the one-stop system under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, and the role of the unitary commander in case resolution. The results of the study show that the case administration process still faces obstacles, especially in terms of the completeness of documents and the accuracy of procedures by Ankum and Papera. Although the one-stop system provides an opportunity to speed up the case process, technological limitations and internal resistance are challenges in the application of the principle of fast, precise, and simple justice. In addition, the role of the unit commander as the initial decision-maker greatly affects the smooth process of resolving cases, even though there is a disparity in the understanding of military law among Ankum. This study recommends increasing legal training for Ankum and Papera, stricter supervision of the implementation of legal procedures, and accelerating the digitalization of the military judicial administration system. Thus, these findings make an important contribution to efforts to improve the military justice system to realize efficiency, transparency, and justice.
Factors Causing Disparity in Judges' Decisions in Narcotics Cases Rahayu, Dessy; Siregar, Taufik; Amal, Ridha Haykal
Journal La Sociale Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Journal La Sociale
Publisher : Borong Newinera Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v6i2.1983

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the factors that cause the disparity in judges' decisions in narcotics cases in Indonesia. The disparity of judges' decisions refers to the difference in the results of decisions between one judge and another in similar cases. The factors that cause this disparity can come from various aspects, both internal and external, that affect the objectivity of the judge in giving the verdict. Some of the factors found include differences in interpretation of the law, the social and cultural background of judges, as well as pressure from the public and the media. In addition, the subjectivity of judges and inconsistency in the application of legal provisions also play a role in creating injustice in the criminal justice system. This study uses a qualitative research method with a literature study approach and interviews with legal practitioners. The results of the study show that the disparity in judges' decisions in narcotics cases can be minimized by having clear standard operating procedures (SOPs), increasing the capacity of judges in understanding narcotics cases, and providing more intensive professional ethics training. The study also suggests the need for tighter supervision of judges' decisions to ensure that every decision taken is in accordance with the principles of justice and applicable law.
Consumer Protection of Export Transportation Services in the Case of Crime of Goods Theft (Juridical Analysis at PT. Spice Lines International, Sunggal District) Sitepu, Dilena; Isnaini, Isnaini; Amal, Ridha Haykal
Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision
Publisher : Pusat Studi Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55885/jprsp.v5i3.639

Abstract

International trade is an important sector in the Indonesian economy, especially through export activities involving sea transportation services. However, in practice, the process of transporting export goods cannot be separated from various risks, one of which is the crime of theft that causes large losses for business actors. This study aims to analyze the legal responsibility of transportation service providers in the case of theft of export goods, as well as to examine the legal protection of service users, especially PT. Spice Lines International which suffered losses due to theft during sea transportation. The research method used is a normative and empirical juridical approach, with data collection techniques through interviews and documentation studies. The results of the study show that although there are legal provisions governing the responsibility of carriers, their implementation is still weak. Many cases of losses due to theft are not resolved through legal channels due to evidentiary constraints, weak contract clauses, and lack of legal understanding from service users. The legal protection provided by laws and regulations has not been fully effective in guaranteeing the rights of service users to obtain compensation. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen legal instruments in transportation agreements, improve logistics security systems, and optimize dispute resolution through mediation or arbitration. This study recommends a reformulation of regulations and synergy between stakeholders to create a fairer and more functional legal protection system in the export transportation service sector.
Co-Authors Arif Susanto Isnaini Isnaini Rahayu, Dessy Siregar, Taufik Sitepu, Dilena