Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL Journal La Sociale Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision
Amal, Ridha Haykal
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal La Sociale

 1 
Implementation of the Role of Ankum and Papera in the Process of Resolving Military Cases in the Jurisdiction Susanto, Arif; Siregar, Taufik; Amal, Ridha Haykal
Journal La Sociale Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Journal La Sociale
Publisher : Borong Newinera Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v6i2.1981

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of the role of Ankum (Superiors Who Have the Right to Sentence) and Papera (Case Submission Officers) in the process of resolving military crime cases in the jurisdiction of the Medan High Military Court I. The approach used is qualitative with descriptive-analytical methods through in-depth interviews, document studies, and observations. The focus of the research includes three main aspects, namely the case administration process in the military judicial environment, the application of fast, precise, and simple judicial principles after the integration of the one-stop system under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, and the role of the unitary commander in case resolution. The results of the study show that the case administration process still faces obstacles, especially in terms of the completeness of documents and the accuracy of procedures by Ankum and Papera. Although the one-stop system provides an opportunity to speed up the case process, technological limitations and internal resistance are challenges in the application of the principle of fast, precise, and simple justice. In addition, the role of the unit commander as the initial decision-maker greatly affects the smooth process of resolving cases, even though there is a disparity in the understanding of military law among Ankum. This study recommends increasing legal training for Ankum and Papera, stricter supervision of the implementation of legal procedures, and accelerating the digitalization of the military judicial administration system. Thus, these findings make an important contribution to efforts to improve the military justice system to realize efficiency, transparency, and justice.
Factors Causing Disparity in Judges' Decisions in Narcotics Cases Rahayu, Dessy; Siregar, Taufik; Amal, Ridha Haykal
Journal La Sociale Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Journal La Sociale
Publisher : Borong Newinera Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v6i2.1983

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the factors that cause the disparity in judges' decisions in narcotics cases in Indonesia. The disparity of judges' decisions refers to the difference in the results of decisions between one judge and another in similar cases. The factors that cause this disparity can come from various aspects, both internal and external, that affect the objectivity of the judge in giving the verdict. Some of the factors found include differences in interpretation of the law, the social and cultural background of judges, as well as pressure from the public and the media. In addition, the subjectivity of judges and inconsistency in the application of legal provisions also play a role in creating injustice in the criminal justice system. This study uses a qualitative research method with a literature study approach and interviews with legal practitioners. The results of the study show that the disparity in judges' decisions in narcotics cases can be minimized by having clear standard operating procedures (SOPs), increasing the capacity of judges in understanding narcotics cases, and providing more intensive professional ethics training. The study also suggests the need for tighter supervision of judges' decisions to ensure that every decision taken is in accordance with the principles of justice and applicable law.
Co-Authors Isnaini Rahayu, Dessy Siregar, Taufik Sitepu, Dilena Syahri Ramadhan, Syahri Syamsiar, Syamsiar