Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Issues in Mathematics Educations (IMED)
Chinsa, Nurhusneini
Unknown Affiliation
Education Mathematics

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Deskripsi Kreativitas Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Literasi Geometri Mulbar, Usman; Alimuddin, Alimuddin; Chinsa, Nurhusneini
Issues in Mathematics Education (IMED) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Peran Model Pembelajaran, Literasi Matematika, Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matema
Publisher : Program of Mathematics Education Department of Mathematics Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (FMIPA) Universitas Negeri Makassar (UNM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35580/imed.v8i1.1797

Abstract

This research aims to describe students' creativity in solving geometric literacy problems based on initial abilities. The population of this research were students of class IX MTs Negeri 3 Enrekang. The researcher used purposive random sampling and obtained 86 students who described quantitatively and 6 students who described qualitatively. The data collection technique is distributed an initial mathematical ability test and a creativity test for geometry. The instruments of this research are the early equivalents of mathematics, the creativity of geometry tests, and the guidance of interviews. This research is qualitatively and quantitatively. The results of this research are from 86 students solving problems related to the surface area and volume of prisms, 36 students fulfilled the fluency indicators, 30 students fulfilled the flexibility indicators, 11 students fulfilled the novelty indicators, and 39 students did not fulfil the three creativity indicatorss. Then from 86 students solving problems related to the surface area and volume of pyramids, 25 students fulfilled the fluency indicators, 22 students fulfilled the flexibility indicators, five students fulfilled the novelty indicators, and 34 students did not fulfil the three creativity indicatorss.
Co-Authors Usman Mulbar