Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman South East Asian Journal of Advanced Law and Governance
Thao, Le Thi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Reconstruction of the Meaning of Makar and Its Relevance to the Concept of al-Baghyu in the Fiqh Jinayah Asmara, Musda; Thao, Le Thi
Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman Vol 26, No 1 (2022): JUNE
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/madania.v26i1.3786

Abstract

The 2019 General Election (Pemilu, Indonesia) divided Indonesian society into two sides, namely the #2019GantiPresiden and the #Jokowi2Periode. The situation between the two sides was tense, which could potentially cause a commotion and worsen the public's situation. Supporters of Jokowi's camp describe the #2019GantiPresiden movement as an attempt to commit makar (treason) against the legitimate government, while the government's opposing side describes the accusation of treason as a violation of democratic freedoms. Based on the foregoing, the question arises as to whether going against the government can be considered makar, which is a criminal act. The type of this study is normative research that uses library research to collect data. This study concludes that opposing the government (Oposisi) or criticizing the government is not makar, but rather the right to free expression. Makar as a negative brand image should not exist in a democratic post-reform environment. It should be used sparingly so that no arbitrariness violates human rights. This corresponds to the definition of al-bughah in Islamic criminal law. Pemilihan umum (Pemilu) pada tahun 2019 telah memecahkan masyarakat dengan dua kubu/ dua gerakan, yaitu gerakan #2019GantiPresiden dan gerakan #Jokowi2Periode. Situasi pun mencekam antara kedua belah pihak yang berpotensi mengarah kepada keributan, dan menyebabkan kondisi masyarakat semakin memanas. Pendukung kubu Jokowi menyebut gerakan #2019GantiPresiden merupakan upaya makar terhadap pemerintahan yang sah, sementara kubu diseberang pemerintah (oposisi) menyebut tuduhan makar tersebut merupakan pelanggaran terhadap kebebasan demokrasi. Berdasarkan latar belakang diatas timbul pertanyaan apakah bersebrangan dengan pemerintah dapat dikatakan sebagai makar yang merupakan tindak pidana?. penelitian ini termasuk jenis penelitian normatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui penelusuran kepustakaan (method of library). Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa bersebrangan dengan pemerintah (oposisi) atau mengkritik pemerintah belum bisa dimaknai sebagai makar melainkan hak kebebasan berpendapat. Makar sebagai brand image negative tidak sewajarnya muncul dalam suasana berdemokrasi pasca reformasi. Seharusnya makar dimakanai secara limitative agar tidak ada kesewenang-wenangan yang merugikan hak asasi manusia. Hal tersebut sejalan dengan makna al-bughah dalam hikum pidana Islam.
Effectiveness of Marriage Age Limit According to Law Number 16 of 2019 in East Lampung Sakirman, Sakirman; Amanda, Yulia Rizki; Thao, Le Thi
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): MILRev : Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v1i2.6206

Abstract

Marriage is a bond between a female guardian (prospective wife) and a male (prospective husband) which is carried out in the presence of two witnesses who meet the requirements. Maturity of age is important to form a prosperous family without ending in divorce. So the government sets the age limit for marriage in Law No. 1 of 1974 whose application creates discrimination, then Article 7 which regulates the age limit for marriage in the Law is changed to Law No. 16 of 2019. This writing aims to determine the effectiveness of the age limit for marriage according to Law No 16 of 2019 in East Lampung, based on data obtained from the case tracking information system at the Sukadana religious court, East Lampung, it turns out that there are still many applications for marriage dispensation, almost 80% of which are granted. This article uses interview and documentation methods. The type of research used is descriptive quantitative research and qualitative research using data from the Sukadana Religious Court SIPP, this article is in the form of the number of applications for marriage dispensation which is expected to provide an overview through the calculation of the data obtained regarding the effectiveness of the marriage age limit in Law No. 16 of 2019 in East Lampung. Based on the results found, it turns out that the application of the Marriage Age Limit in Law No. 16 of 2019 has not been effectively implemented in East Lampung, especially at the Sukadana Religious Court, seen from the large number of marriage applications that have been granted.
Harmonization of Asset Valuation Laws in ASEAN Member States: A Comparative Legal Analysis of Regulatory Divergence and Convergence Thao, Le Thi
South East Asian Journal of Advanced Law and Governance (SEAJ-ALGov) Vol 3 No 1 (2026): Public law: the development and the challenges
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/seaj-algov.v3i1.27616

Abstract

This article examines the challenges of harmonizing asset valuation laws across ASEAN member states amid increasing regional economic integration. Despite the establishment of the ASEAN Economic Community, regulatory fragmentation in asset valuation continues to create legal uncertainty for cross-border transactions. This study assesses whether legal harmonization in asset valuation within ASEAN is necessary and practically achievable by adopting a comparative doctrinal legal methodology, analyzing statutory frameworks and regulatory practices in selected ASEAN jurisdictions, including Singapore, Vietnam, and Indonesia. The analysis focuses on three dimensions: valuation standards, regulatory governance, and enforcement mechanisms. The findings reveal significant divergences across member states, particularly in the absence of unified valuation standards, varying institutional capacities, and inconsistent regulatory enforcement. These challenges hinder effective legal harmonization and limit the efficiency of regional financial integration. The article argues that a hybrid harmonization model—combining regional soft-law coordination with gradual domestic legal alignment—offers a more feasible pathway for ASEAN. This approach provides practical policy implications for strengthening regulatory coordination, enhancing legal certainty, and facilitating cross-border transactions. This study contributes to the literature by reframing asset valuation not merely as a technical issue but as a core regulatory challenge in ASEAN legal integration.
Co-Authors Amanda, Yulia Rizki Musda Asmara Sakirman Sakirman