Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Lex Renaissance Jurnal Elektronik Pendidikan Matematika Tadulako
Somawijaya
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD BERBANTUAN ALAT PERAGA KOTAK GESER UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA PEMFAKTORAN BENTUK KUADRAT KELAS VIII SMPN 2 PALU Somawijaya
Jurnal Elektronik Pendidikan Matematika Tadulako Vol. 2 No. 3 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Tadulako

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh deskripsi penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD berbantuan alat peraga kotak geser yang dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada materi pemfaktoran bentuk kuadrat di kelas VIII SMPN 2 Palu. Jenis penelitian ini adalah peneletian tindakan kelas (PTK). Rancangan penelitian ini mengacu pada model Kemmis dan Mc.Taggart yang terdiri dari empat komponen, yaitu (1) perencanaan, (2) pelaksanaan tindakan, (3) observasi, dan (4) refleksi. Penelitian ini terdiri dari dua siklus dan masing-masing siklus dilaksanakan dalam dua kali pertemua. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD berbantuan alat peraga kotak geser dapat meningkat­kan hasil belajar siswa pada materi pemfaktoran bentuk kuadrat di kelas VIII SMPN 2 Palu mengikuti fase-fase model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD yaitu (1) menyampaikan tujuan pembelajaran dan memotivasi siswa, (2) penyajian kelas, (3) belajar kelompok, (4) tim studi dan monitoring, (5) tes, (6) penghargaan kelompok. Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD, alat peraga kotak geser, hasil belajar, pemfaktoran bentuk kuadrat. Abstrack: The aim of this research was to obtain the description of applying the cooperative learning of STAD aided box slide tools to improve students result learning Factoring of quadratic class VIII SMPN 2 Palu. This research was a classroom action rescarch (CAR). The research design refered to the design of the Kemmis and Mc. Taggart that is (1) planning, (2) action, (3) Observation, and (4) reflection. This research was conducted in two cycles. The research result showed that the applying the cooperative learning of STAD aided box slide tools to improve students result learning Factoring of quadratic in grade class VIII SMPN 2 Palu phases following theses steps, as follow (1) conveying the learning objectives and motivate the student, (2) presentation of class, (3) study in group, (4) monitoring and study team, (5) test, and (6) group appreciation. Keyords: cooperative learning of STAD, box slide tools, stududents result learning,factoring of quadratic.
Implikasi Hukum Terhadap Orang Tua Yang Menelantarkan Anak Ditinjau Dari Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Manisha Ramadanni; Somawijaya
Lex Renaissance Vol 8 No 2 (2023): DESEMBER 2023
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol8.iss2.art6

Abstract

This research is motivated by the rapid increase in cases of child neglect by parents in Indonesia in the last 3 years. Legally related to the criminal act of child neglect, there are several legal arrangements that regulate. This research has two problem formulations as follows, first, how is the legal regulation of parents who neglect children in the criminal act of neglect in terms of criminal law in Indonesia? Second, what are the legal consequences for parents who neglect children in the criminal act of neglect in terms of criminal law in Indonesia? The research method used is normative legal method, which examines mere secondary data such as the 1945 Constitution, Old Criminal Code, New Criminal Code, PKDRT Law, Child Protection Law, journals, articles, scientific works, and dictionaries. The results obtained from this study indicate that the current legal arrangements for parents who neglect their children refer to Article 76 letter b jo Article 77 letter b of the Child Protection Law. In addition, the legal consequences for parents who neglect their children are a prison sentence with a maximum of 5 years and a fine with a maximum of Rp. 100,000,000. Suggestions from this research are addressed to parents and KPAI to carry out their duties, obligations, and responsibilities as well as possible.Keywords: Criminal Law, Parents, Child Neglect. AbstrakPermasalahan Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh lajunya peningkatan kasus penelantaran anak oleh orang tua di Indonesia dalam 3 tahun terakhir. Secara hukum terkait tindak pidana penelantaran anak terdapat beberapa pengaturan hukum yang mengatur. Penelitian ini memiliki dua rumusan masalah sebagai berikut: pertama, bagaimana pengaturan hukum terhadap orang tua yang menelantarkan anak dalam tindak pidana penelantaran ditinjau dari hukum pidana di Indonesia? Kedua, bagaimana akibat hukum terhadap orang tua yang menelantarkan anak dalam tindak pidana penelantaran ditinjau dari hukum pidana di Indonesia? Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode hukum normatif, yaitu meneliti data sekunder belaka seperti UUD 1945, KUHP Lama, KUHP Baru, UU PKDRT, UU Perlindungan Anak, jurnal, artikel, karya ilmiah, dan kamus. Hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan hukum terhadap orang tua yang menelantarkan anak yang berlaku saat ini yaitu merujuk pada Pasal 76 huruf b jo Pasal 77 huruf b UU Perlindungan Anak. Selain itu, akibat hukum bagi orang tua pelaku penelantaran anak adalah hukuman penjara dengan maksimal 5 tahun dan hukuman denda dengan maksimal Rp. 100.000.000. Saran dari penelitian ini ditujukan kepada orang tua dan KPAI agar menjalankan tugas, kewajiban, dan tanggung jawabnya dengan sebaik-baiknya.Kata Kunci: Hukum Pidana, Orang Tua, Penelantaran Anak.
Admissibility of Artificial Intelligence as Electronic Evidence: Comparative Perspectives from Indonesia, the United States, and Japan Hendri Antoro; Danrivanto Budhijanto; Somawijaya
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan (in progress)
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v14i1.1880

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into digital forensic and evidentiary processes, raising unresolved doctrinal questions in criminal procedure law. In Indonesia, although electronic evidence is formally recognized, the law does not yet provide specific admissibility standards for AI-based materials, particularly regarding authenticity, methodological reliability, process traceability, explainability, and accountability. This study examines the admissibility of AI as electronic evidence in Indonesia and compares it with legal approaches in the United States and Japan. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches to analyze the evidentiary frameworks of the three jurisdictions. The findings show that the United States emphasizes expert gatekeeping and digital authentication, while Japan adopts a softer regulatory model centered on traceability, documentation, and actor accountability. By contrast, Indonesia, still lacks specific procedural standards for assessing AI-generated outputs beyond the general recognition of electronic evidence. This article argues that the key legal issue is no longer whether electronic evidence is admissible in general, but how AI-based evidence should be evaluated in a legally reliable and accountable manner. The scientific contribution of this study lies in proposing a five-parameter evaluative model for AI admissibility—covering authenticity and integrity, process traceability, model performance, identity verification, and accountability. This model is offered as a normative reference for future reform of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, while safeguarding legal certainty and justice.
Co-Authors Danrivanto Budhijanto Hendri Antoro Manisha Ramadanni