Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal GAUSS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika JME (Journal of Mathematics Education)
I Luh Restini
Universitas Tadulako
Mathematics

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PROFILE OF STUDENTS' METACOGNITIVE SKILLS IN SOLVING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS OF SMPN 3 PALU IN VIEW OF MATHEMATICAL ABILITY I Luh Restini; Pathuddin Pathuddin; Bakri Bakri; Sukayasa Sukayasa
JME (Journal of Mathematics Education) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): JME
Publisher : USN Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31327/jme.v8i2.1970

Abstract

Understanding students' metacognitive skills in solving math problems concerning their mathematical abilities is crucial foridentifying the cognitive processes involved in problem-solving. This study investigates the metacognitive skills of SMPN 3 Palu students with varying mathematical abilities in problem-solving. It focuses on students in class VIIJ during the 2022/2023 academic year, individually analyzing one high-ability and one low-ability student. The research, descriptive in nature, employs qualitative methods using written assignments and interviews for data collection. This study's analysis involved condensing data, presenting findings, and drawing conclusions. The findings reveal distinct approaches between high and low mathematical ability subjects. High-ability students consistently apply all three metacognitive skills (planning, monitoring, and assessment) across each problem-solving stage. Conversely, low-ability students demonstrate a limited use of metacognitive skills. While they employ planning at each stage, during implementation and result review, they primarily engage in planning and monitoring, neglecting assessment. Ultimately, it underscores the critical role of metacognitive skills in mathematical problem-solving, highlighting differences in their application between students of varying mathematical abilities.
Penerapan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi dengan Model PBL untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa: Application of Differentiation Learning Using The Pbl Model to Improve Students’ Mathematics Learning Outcomes I Luh Restini; Dasa Ismaimuza; Fatmawati
GAUSS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Serang Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30656/gauss.v7i2.9445

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan pembelajaran berdiferensiasi dengan PBL untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Desain penelitian ini mengacu pada Arikunto dalam Muslimin dkk., (2022), yaitu (1) tahap perencanaan;  (2) tahap pelaksanaan; (3) tahap pengamatan; (4) tahap refleksi. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII Ahmad Dahlan berjumlah 33 siswa yang terdiri dari 15 siswa laki-laki dan 18 siswa perempuan tahun ajaran 2023/2024. Penelitian ini dilakukan dalam dua siklus. Hasil penetian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Terjadi peningkatan ketuntasan individual siswa dari siklus I ke 81,25% siklus II; (2) Terjadi peningkatan ketuntasan klasikal siswa dari 72,7% pada siklus I ke pada siklus II.; (3) Aktivitas guru dan siswa terjadi peningkatan dari kategori cukup pada siklus I menjadi baik dan sangat baik pada siklus II untuk semua aktivitas guru dan siswa Kata kunci: Berdiferensiasi, PBL, Hasil Belajar Abstract This research aims to determine the application of differentiated learning with PBL to improve mathematics learning outcomes. The type of research used is Classroom Action Research. This research design refers to Arikunto in Muslimin et al., (2022), namely (1) planning stage;  (2) implementation stage; (3) observation stage; (4) reflection stage. The subjects of this research were 33 class VIII students, Ahmad Dahlan, consisting of 15 male students and 18 female students for the 2023/2024 academic year. This research was conducted in two cycles. The research results showed that: (1) There was an increase in individual student completeness from cycle I to 81.25% in cycle II; (2) There was an increase in students' classical completeness from 72.7% in cycle I to cycle II; (3) Teacher and student activities increased from the adequate category in cycle I to good and very good in cycle II for all teacher and student activities.  Keywords: Differentiated, PBL, Learning Outcomes
Co-Authors Bakri Bakri Dasa Ismaimuza Fatmawati Pathuddin Sukayasa