Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lex Scientia Law Review Contemporary Islamic Law and Legal Issue
Naeem AllahRakha
Tashkent State University of Law
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Role of Islamic Law in Contemporary Constitutional Systems: Comparative Perspectives on Governance in Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, and Egypt Syed Agung Afandi; Naeem AllahRakha; Muslim Afandi; Rizki Erdayani; Nail Hidaya Afandi
Contemporary Islamic Law and Legal Issue Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Presscience

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63120/islamiclegalissue.v1i2.99

Abstract

This article explores the constitutional role of Islamic law (Sharia) within contemporary governance frameworks across four Muslim-majority states such as Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, and Egypt. It argues that the interface between Sharia and constitutionalism represents an evolving negotiation of moral legitimacy, institutional design, and political power rather than a fixed dichotomy between secularism and theocracy. Using a comparative qualitative approach grounded in constitutional pluralism and governance legitimacy theory, the study analyzes constitutions, judicial decisions, and legislative instruments from 1945 to 2024. The findings identify three typological models of Islamic constitutional governance. The integrationist model, exemplified by Pakistan, embeds Sharia into the constitutional core through specialized courts and councils, reinforcing religious authority but limiting legislative autonomy. The dualist model, found in Malaysia, institutionalizes parallel jurisdictions between civil and Sharia courts, ensuring religious autonomy but perpetuating jurisdictional uncertainty. The contextual-adaptive model, as in Indonesia, integrates Sharia through decentralization and judicial review, balancing local autonomy and national oversight. Egypt, meanwhile, represents a hybrid statist model, where state institutions monopolize religious interpretation to maintain regime legitimacy. Comparative analysis reveals that constitutional trajectories depend less on religious doctrine than on the interplay of judicial independence, political coalitions, and decentralization. When Sharia interpretation aligns with maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah and human rights principles, it strengthens democratic legitimacy and legal pluralism. The article concludes by proposing a contextual constitutionalism model, offering an institutional framework for reconciling divine authority with constitutional democracy in Muslim-majority societies.
Cybersecurity Regulations for Protection and Safeguarding Digital Assets (Data) in Today’s Worlds Naeem AllahRakha
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Contemporary Legal Challenges and Solutions in a Global Context
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i1.2081

Abstract

This paper examines cybersecurity regulations and practices for safeguarding digital assets like data in today's interconnected landscape. As cyber risks flourish, comprehensive frameworks outlining technical, administrative, and legal protocols are vital for securing critical systems and sensitive information. The paper's background emphasizes rising digitization, surging threat sophistication, and necessitating diligent governance. Its objectives include analyzing prominent regulations and highlighting principles around confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The qualitative study adopts a doctrinal approach and grounded theory analysis to methodically assess prominent legislation. The paper discusses legislative developments in domains like breach disclosure, identity authentication, and encryption methodologies that strengthen cyber resilience. It suggests reconciling compliance complexity through oversight alignment. The paper concludes by underscoring the need for positive incentives and public-private partnerships that collectively enhance cyber hygiene. It recommends consistent interpretation and proactive investments in capacity building to secure our deepening digital economy against exponentially evolving threats.
Co-Authors Afandi, Syed Agung Erdayani, Rizki Muslim Afandi Nail Hidaya Afandi