Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kosmik Hukum Journal of Private and Commercial Law
Desia Banjarani
Universitas Sriwijaya
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Unlawful Acts in Determination of Joint Property and Donations Study of Decision Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/Pn.Kpg Desia Banjarani; Muslim Nugraha; Syahri Ramadhan; Sri Handayani
Journal of Private and Commercial Law Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): November, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jpcl.v8i2.11893

Abstract

Analysis of Padang District Court Decision Plaintiff Name Aleta Salomi Derica Kale-Pa Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Kpg., concerning joint property grants. The legal issues raised in this analysis are: How is the analysis of the determination of joint property in Decision Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Kpg? And how can grants and control over the object of the grant be categorized as unlawful acts in Decision Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Kpg? The method used in this analysis is the IRAC Method which is a legal reasoning method with issue analysis (I), rule of law (R), argument (A), and conclusion (C). Several legal issues analyzed from the decision are to determine the object of the grant, in this case land, which is joint property, the judge's first step is to prove that the plaintiff and the landowner are husband and wife as evidenced by the Marriage Certificate. Then the next proof is related to the determination of joint property as evidenced by the land sale and purchase document. Regarding the sale and purchase process, it is also supported by the testimony of witnesses who in essence state that the witnesses know directly about the sale and purchase of the land. The grant in Decision Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Kpg has been declared as an unlawful act because the object of the grant has been proven to be joint property that was granted without the consent of the Plaintiff as the wife of the landowner. Thus, the grant is declared contrary to Article 36 paragraph 1 of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Article 1666 of the Civil Code and Article 584 of the Civil Code. So based on the civil legal basis, the grant made by an unauthorized party must be declared null and void as an absolute nullity with all its legal consequences. Thus, according to the research, the decision of Decision Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Kpg is correct because the judge's considerations are in accordance with the concrete evidence as submitted by the parties.
Investigating Economic Crimes by Indonesia’s Attorney General’s Office: Empirical Findings and Policy Implications Artha Febriansyah; Hardiansyah; Desia Banjarani; Vera Novianti
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 25 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v25i3.27417

Abstract

Economic crimes in Indonesia, such as corruption, money laundering, and financial fraud, have shown significant growth and increasingly complex patterns in recent years. These dynamics demand innovative and integrated strategies from law enforcement agencies. This research examines the exercise of investigative authority by the Attorney General’s Office of Indonesia, focusing on both its implementation and practical implications. Employing normative legal research supported by empirical data, the study applies case and legislative approaches analyzed through qualitative description. Findings reveal the dual realities of economic crime investigations: notable achievements supported by institutional frameworks and legal mandates, as well as persistent challenges including procedural limitations, coordination barriers, and limited resources. The analysis further identifies factors contributing to investigative success, alongside obstacles that hinder effectiveness. Beyond mapping these realities, the study evaluates the empirical implications of investigative practices for law enforcement policies. The findings highlight the necessity of integrating empirical approaches to capture field realities and inform responsive legal strategies. As a result, the research proposes policy recommendations aimed at strengthening institutional capacity, refining investigative mechanisms, and enhancing overall law enforcement integrity. Ultimately, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of how empirical perspectives can improve the effectiveness of economic crime investigations in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Artha Febriansyah Hardiansyah Muslim Nugraha Sri Handayani Syahri Ramadhan Vera Novianti