Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Private and Commercial Law Legal System Journal
Muslim Nugraha
Universitas Sriwijaya
Humanities Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS UNSUR PERBUATAN MELANGGAR HUKUM ATAS PENGGUNAAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DALAM KASUS KONTEN DEEPFAKE Muslim Nugraha; Amanda Sela Sadina; Viraliza Ramadonna; Keysyah Aulia Hidayat
Legal System Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Edisi Juni 2025
Publisher : CV. Kimtaro Jaya Abadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70656/lsj.v2i1.392

Abstract

Penyebarluasan konten deepfake yang dapat merugikan seseorang akibat dari penyalahgunaan Artificial Intelligence (AI) merupakan tindakan yang melanggar kaidah hukum privat dan memberikan akibat hukum sehingga mewajibkan pelaku penyebarluasan konten deepfake untuk bertanggung jawab terhadap korban yang dirugikan oleh konten deepfake. Permasalahan muncul ketika dihadapkan dengan ketidakjelasan status AI sebagai subjek hukum yang dianggap berperan penting dan bahkan mampu menterjemahkan kehendak manusia, sehingga menciptakan hasil yang diinginkan oleh pelaku dalam proses pembuatan konten deepfake. Dilematika hukum yang terjadi ketika perlu menegaskan siapa yang bertanggung jawab atas kerugian yang dialami oleh korban. Tulisan ini dibuat dengan menggunakan penelitan hukum normatif dengan melakukan pendekatan perundang-undangan yang berfokus pada unsur-unsur perbuatan melanggar hukum dalam KUHPerdata. Analisis dilakukan dengan mengkaji pemenuhan unsur-unsur perbuatan melanggar hukum dalam kasus deepfake sehingga menghasilkan kesimpulan yang menegaskan bahwa penyalahgunaan AI dalam pembuatan dan penyebarluasan konten deepfake harus dipertanggungjawabkan oleh manusia sebagai pihak yang memiliki niat dalam menyebarluaskan konten tersebut. Selain itu diperlukannya pengembangan regulasi yang mengakomodasi pemanfaatan teknologi AI, agar membantu terwujudnya perlindungan hukum yang lebih efektif terhadap korban penyalahgunaan AI dalam dunia digital
Unlawful Acts in Determination of Joint Property and Donations Study of Decision Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/Pn.Kpg Desia Banjarani; Muslim Nugraha; Syahri Ramadhan; Sri Handayani
Journal of Private and Commercial Law Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): November, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jpcl.v8i2.11893

Abstract

Analysis of Padang District Court Decision Plaintiff Name Aleta Salomi Derica Kale-Pa Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Kpg., concerning joint property grants. The legal issues raised in this analysis are: How is the analysis of the determination of joint property in Decision Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Kpg? And how can grants and control over the object of the grant be categorized as unlawful acts in Decision Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Kpg? The method used in this analysis is the IRAC Method which is a legal reasoning method with issue analysis (I), rule of law (R), argument (A), and conclusion (C). Several legal issues analyzed from the decision are to determine the object of the grant, in this case land, which is joint property, the judge's first step is to prove that the plaintiff and the landowner are husband and wife as evidenced by the Marriage Certificate. Then the next proof is related to the determination of joint property as evidenced by the land sale and purchase document. Regarding the sale and purchase process, it is also supported by the testimony of witnesses who in essence state that the witnesses know directly about the sale and purchase of the land. The grant in Decision Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Kpg has been declared as an unlawful act because the object of the grant has been proven to be joint property that was granted without the consent of the Plaintiff as the wife of the landowner. Thus, the grant is declared contrary to Article 36 paragraph 1 of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Article 1666 of the Civil Code and Article 584 of the Civil Code. So based on the civil legal basis, the grant made by an unauthorized party must be declared null and void as an absolute nullity with all its legal consequences. Thus, according to the research, the decision of Decision Number 190/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Kpg is correct because the judge's considerations are in accordance with the concrete evidence as submitted by the parties.
Co-Authors Amanda Sela Sadina Desia Banjarani Keysyah Aulia Hidayat Sri Handayani Syahri Ramadhan Viraliza Ramadonna