Undang Prasetya Umara
Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Application of the Dualistic Doctrine at the Investigation Stage under the 2025 Criminal Procedure Code Undang Prasetya Umara; Nanda Saputra Umara
Jurnal Hukum Replik Vol 14 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Replik
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/jhr.v14i1.15760

Abstract

This article examines the application of the dualistic doctrine at the investigation stage under the 2025 Criminal Procedure Code and its implications for legal certainty and the protection of suspects’ rights within Indonesia’s criminal justice system. The dualistic doctrine, which emphasizes a clear separation between the criminal act and criminal liability, is analyzed as a theoretical framework that should guide investigators’ authority in determining suspect status and employing coercive measures. This study employs normative legal research with empirical reinforcement, using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, complemented by an analysis of investigative practices and the pretrial mechanism. The findings demonstrate that although the 2025 Criminal Procedure Code has normatively accommodated the principles of the dualistic doctrine and due process of law, its implementation in investigative practice remains inconsistent, as reflected in the tendency toward premature designation of suspects and the disproportionate use of coercive measures. Such disregard for the dualistic doctrine results in weakened legal certainty, erosion of the presumption of innocence, and the emergence of legal suffering and social stigmatization for suspects, even in cases that ultimately do not lead to criminal conviction. This article argues that the dualistic doctrine is not only relevant as a doctrine of substantive criminal law, but also serves a strategic function in criminal procedural law as an operational principle that limits investigative power, strengthens the role of pretrial review, and preserves the legitimacy of the criminal justice system. Accordingly, the consistent internalization of the dualistic doctrine at the investigation stage under the 2025 Criminal Procedure Code constitutes an essential prerequisite for the realization of a fair criminal justice system that ensures legal certainty and is oriented toward the protection of human rights.KeywordsDualistic doctrine, investigation, Criminal Procedure Code 2025, suspect determination, criminal procedure law.
Comparison Of Protection Laws Private Data In Indonesia, And The Philippines Amiludin Amiludin; Siti Nurhalisa; Undang Prasetya Umara; Hidayatullah
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i2.4266

Abstract

To compare private data protection regulations in Indonesia and the Philippines and understand dispute resolution related to private data cases in the two countries. This research method uses literature review studies derived from books and journals or articles that have been published. The research findings reveal a comparison between the Private Data Protection Act in Indonesia and the Philippines. It is noted that the Philippines already has an independent supervisory body, whereas Indonesia does not, despite the establishment of such an institution being regulated by the Private Data Protection Act number 27 of 2022. Additionally, the study aims to understand the dispute resolution mechanisms in case of private data theft in both Indonesia and the Philippines. This study compares the regulations of the Private Data Protection Act in Indonesia and the Philippines, focusing particularly on the establishment of an essential independent supervisory body that needs to be formed in Indonesia. Subsequently, the case resolution mechanisms through Alternative Dispute Resolution can be considered to eliminate practices that tend to be slow, complex, and expensive, as well as to stop corrupt practices in the courts, ensuring that the Indonesian community feels secure and protected. No specific research has been found that compares the regulations on Private Data Protection in Indonesia and the Philippines. This includes the establishment of an independent supervisory body to aid law enforcement authorities in identifying perpetrators of private data theft, providing education, and addressing public inquiries about private data. Additionally, the resolution of cases involving private data theft through alternative dispute resolution is deemed superior to the judicial route due to the frequent practices of being slow, complex, expensive, and corrupt, which can erode or even eliminate the trust of the Indonesian public in law enforcement authorities.