Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Innovative Digital Pedagogies in Mathematics and Science Learning Sry Wahyuni Zandri; Arnelis; Suherman; Yuliyanti Harisman; Yerizon
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 5 (2025): May
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i5.11390

Abstract

This study reviews innovative digital pedagogies integrated into mathematics and science classrooms, focusing on tools such as virtual simulations, dynamic geometry software, augmented reality, mobile applications, flipped classrooms, and intelligent tutoring systems. The purpose is to examine their impact on student engagement, conceptual understanding, and pedagogical effectiveness. Findings indicate that these digital tools enhance interactivity and learner autonomy, promote deeper conceptual understanding through visualization and feedback, and increase student motivation and participation. Adaptive technologies that provide personalized feedback show promise in matching the effectiveness of human tutoring. However, technology alone does not guarantee improved learning outcomes; effective integration requires intentional pedagogical design aligning content, pedagogy, and technology. Challenges include infrastructure limitations and educational inequity, particularly in under-resourced regions. Additionally, a shift in the teacher’s role toward facilitator and designer of learning experiences is critical.
Literature Science Analysis on the Validity and Practicality Criteria of GeoGebra-Supported Mathematics Learning Modules Nelvy Yunita; Suherman; Edwin Musdi; Zusti Jamaan
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 9 (2025): September
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i9.12355

Abstract

This study presents a systematic literature review analyzing the validity and practicality of GeoGebra-supported mathematics learning modules. The purpose is to evaluate the scientific quality and classroom feasibility of these modules based on empirical evidence from published research between 2013 and 2023. A total of 27 studies were synthesized using PRISMA guidelines to assess content, construct, and instructional design validity, as well as ease of use, time efficiency, and user response. Findings indicate that most modules demonstrate high content validity through expert validation and curriculum alignment, and are perceived as practical and engaging by teachers and students. However, gaps exist in empirical validation of learning constructs and in the integration of cognitive load principles within instructional design. Challenges such as extended implementation time, technical barriers, and insufficient teacher training affect practicality in real classroom settings. The study concludes that while GeoGebra-supported modules hold strong potential for enhancing mathematics learning, their effectiveness depends on pedagogical soundness, systematic development, and contextual support. Standardized evaluation frameworks and improved teacher readiness are recommended for sustainable implementation.