Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Journal of Law and Social Politics Sultan Adam : Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Jimly Legal Yustisia Journal
Pandiangan, Roni
Unknown Affiliation
Aerospace Engineering Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN PIDANA KURATOR PELAKU PENGGUNAAN SURAT PALSU DALAM PENGURUSAN HARTA PAILIT. Sahrul, Ibnu Ibrahim; Candra, Tofik Yanuar; Pandiangan, Roni
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 5 (2024): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Mei 2024
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v3i5.2750

Abstract

An analysis of the criminal liability of curators involved in the use of forged letters in the management of bankruptcy property highlights the legal responsibility that must be borne by them for such actions. Focusing on criminal and civil legal aspects, this analysis aims to establish justice, maintain transparency, and protect the interests of all parties involved in bankruptcy proceedings. By establishing appropriate legal consequences, this analysis also plays a role in providing a deterrent effect as well as preventing the recurrence of similar violations in the future, thus maintaining the integrity of the bankruptcy law system.Top of Form The method used in this study is normative juridical legal research, conducted by examining library materials or secondary data only, supported by interviews. The approaches in this study include the legislative approach, the conceptual approach, the analytical approach, and the case approach. The sources of legal material in this study are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources, with the collection technique involving the identification and inventory of positive legal rules, examination of library materials, and analysis of legal material sources through systematic and analogous legal interpretation. The result of this study is that criminal acts by the curator in the management of bankruptcy property must pay attention to two functions of criminal law: as law enforcement and Norm enforcement. The curator must be independent and comply with the requirements of legal regulations; otherwise, it can be replaced by a supervisory judge. They must also uphold the principles of honesty and openness. Criminal liability curators who use fake letters emphasize the importance of ethics and professionalism, and can lead to legal consequences both criminal and civil if there is abuse of authority.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM ARBITRASE PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA BISNIS SESUAI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG ARBITRASE LEGAL CERTAINTY Wamnebo, Frangky; TW, Gatut Hendro; Pandiangan, Roni
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 9 (2025): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, September 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v2i9.1759

Abstract

The conflict of norms between Article 3 in conjunction with Article 11 of the Arbitration Law and APS with law number 48 of year 2009 the Law Judicial power has resulted in inconsistencies in court decisions The Law Of Torts in the law cases that are boundby arbitration clauses. Decision No.10/Pdt.G/2010/PN.JKT prioritizes Article10 number 48 of year 2009 the Law Judicial power ,while Decision No. 629/PDT/2011/PT. DKI and Decision No. Putusan MA No.862 K/PDT/2013 is guided by the Arbitration Law.The problem formulation used; First, how are the arbitration process arrangements regulated according to Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration?Second, what is the legal certainty of implementing arbitration decisions in resolving business disputes? This research aims to analyze the differences in the legal basis used in the three decisions and evaluate legal certainty in resolving regarding unlawful acts the law disputes that are bound by arbitration clauses. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory, case study, and conceptual approach. The research results show that Article 10 number 48 of year 2009 the Law Judicial power Law is contrary to the principle of pacta sunt servanda and is based on the principle of lex specialis specialiteit,which places the Arbitration Law as a more specific regulation in The Law Of Torts disputes that are bound by arbitration agreements. This conflict of norms creates legal uncertainty, which has the potential to harm the parties. The conclusion research recommends that Article 10 number 48 of year 2009 the Law Judicial power Law be harmonized with the Arbitration Law and encourages judges to make the Arbitration Law the main guideline in The Law Of Torts disputes that are bound by arbitration clauses. This step is important to uphold the principle of pacta sunt servanda and achieve legal certainty
Keabsahan Surat Peringatan sebagai Pengganti Akta Pengakuan Utang dalam Lelang Eksekusi Tanggungan Rahardian Utama, Muhamad Adji; Hakim, Nur; Pandiangan, Roni
JIMLY LEGAL YUSTISIA JOURNAL Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Volume 1 Number 2 June 2024
Publisher : Jimly School of Law and Government

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The process of foreclosure under Indonesian law generally requires a debt acknowledgment deed as valid evidence of legal relationship between debtor and creditor. However, current practices show that warning letters are sometimes used as an alternative to the debt acknowledgment deed in some foreclosure cases. The issue raised in this study concerns the validity of using Warning Letter as substitution for Debt Acknowledgment Deed in the execution auction process of collateral rights in Indonesia. The Debt Acknowledgment Deed holds an important position in Indonesian law as a valid legal instrument that facilitates the execution against debtors who fail to repay their debts. Meanwhile, the Warning Letter is often used as an initial step in debt collection, but it does not carry the same legal force as the Debt Acknowledgment Deed. The purpose of this writing is to analyze the validity of using the Warning Letter as a substitute for the Debt Acknowledgment Deed in the execution auction procedure of collateral rights. The method used in this research is normative approach by analyzing the applicable regulations, jurisprudence, and relevant legal doctrines. The results of this research show that, although the Warning Letter plays an important role in the early stages of debt collection, it cannot replace the legal status of the Debt Acknowledgment Deed in the execution auction of collateral rights. Therefore, further regulation is needed regarding the use of the Warning Letter in the execution auction process of collateral rights to provide legal certainty for both parties, creditors and debtors.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KREDITUR TERHADAP DEBITUR YANG PAILIT KARENA FORCE MAJEURE Usasra, Afad Pratama; Hakim, Nur; Pandiangan, Roni
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, February 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v3i2.2349

Abstract

Bankruptcy is a legal mechanism intended to provide legal certainty and fairness for the parties involved, particularly creditors and debtors, in situations where the debtor is unable to fulfill debt obligations. However, in practice, bankruptcy caused by force majeure raises specific legal issues, especially regarding the form and scope of legal protection for creditors. Conditions of force majeure may place the debtor in a position of non-performance without fault, which potentially creates an imbalance of interests between creditors and debtors. The method used in this research is normative legal research, conducted as an effort to obtain the necessary data related to the problem. The data used are secondary data and tertiary legal materials. In addition, primary data is also used to support the secondary legal materials. Data analysis is conducted using qualitative legal analysis methods. The theories used in this research are the Legal Protection Theory and the Risk Theory. The results of the study indicate that legal protection for creditors in bankruptcy caused by force majeure is still provided through the principle of paritas creditorum and the mechanism of bankruptcy estate settlement conducted by the curator. However, the Bankruptcy Law has not explicitly regulated differentiated treatment for debtors who become bankrupt without fault. Therefore, equitable legal interpretation and more comprehensive legal policies are required to ensure a balance of rights and obligations between creditors and debtors in bankruptcy situations caused by force majeure.  
Debtor's Right of Cassation in PKPU Following Constitutional Court Decision 23/PUU-XIX/2021: Consequences for the Protection of Banks as Separate Creditors Pandiangan, Roni
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i2.92

Abstract

Background: Banks as financial institutions that perform the function of collecting and distributing public funds often face the problem of bad credit or Non-Performing Loans (NPL). In an effort to provide legal protection, the state has regulated the collateral mechanism through mortgage rights as stipulated in Law Number 4 of 1996. However, in practice, the execution of collateral often encounters obstacles, especially when the debtor is undergoing a Suspension of Debt Payment Obligation (PKPU) process based on Law Number 37 of 2004. Objective: This study aims to analyze the legal position of banks as separate creditors in the PKPU process and evaluate the quantitative impact of cassation-induced execution delays on bank NPL ratios. Methods: This research uses normative legal methods with a normative juridical approach as its primary approach. The prescriptive nature of the research is directed toward formulating PERMA/SEMA recommendations that balance debtor constitutional rights with bank legal certainty. Results: The results show that separate creditors have a strong position in the PKPU process. However, the decision causes the bankruptcy status to not be inracht, thereby delaying the execution of collateral by banks. This delay results in hindered asset recovery and an increased risk of NPL, which can affect bank health according to Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 15/2/PBI/2013. Therefore, further regulations are needed to ensure legal certainty and protection. Conclusion: Constitutional Court Decision 23/PUU-XIX/2021 structurally weakens the legal protection of banks as separate creditors by introducing a non-suspensive cassation mechanism that delays execution of mortgage rights.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PENILAI PUBLIK: PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROFESI DI INDONESIA Ananda, Fauzan; Ginting, Salmon; Pandiangan, Roni
SULTAN ADAM: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Januari-Juni 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Tanggui Baimbaian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71456/sultan.v4i1.1831

Abstract

Perkembangan sektor ekonomi dan pembangunan di Indonesia mempengaruhi kebutuhan akan jasa penilai publik yang semakin vital. Meskipun profesi ini memiliki peran strategis, perlindungan hukum yang ada masih belum cukup memadai, mengingat ketidakpastian hukum yang dihadapi oleh penilai publik dalam menjalankan tugasnya. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji urgensi perlindungan hukum bagi penilai publik dan bagaimana perspektif hukum profesi dapat mempertegas hak bagi profesi penilai publik untuk mendapatkan perhatian yang setara dengan profesi lainnya sesuai apa yang merupakan hak dasar yang dijamin oleh Undang Undang Dasar 1945. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, menganalisis peraturan yang ada dan membandingkannya dengan pengaturan di negara lain. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan hukum yang ada saat ini tidak cukup memberikan perlindungan terhadap penilai publik, mengakibatkan ketidakpastian dan risiko hukum yang besar. Kesimpulannya, diperlukan undang-undang khusus yang mengatur profesi penilai publik untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum yang lebih jelas dan komprehensif, serta untuk menjaga independensi dan akuntabilitas profesi ini dalam mendukung pembangunan ekonomi yang adil dan berkelanjutan.
Co-Authors Ananda, Fauzan Candra, Tofik Yanuar Ginting, Salmon Hakim, Nur Rahardian Utama, Muhamad Adji Sahrul, Ibnu Ibrahim TW, Gatut Hendro Usasra, Afad Pratama Wamnebo, Frangky