Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pasca Lahirnya Dewan Pengawas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) Nawir
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 7 (2024): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v5i7.1010

Abstract

The revision of Law No. 19 of 2019 which established the KPK Supervisory Board (Dewas) has sparked debate regarding its impact on the performance and independence of this anti-corruption institution. This topic is very relevant considering the decline in the KPK's performance in handling major corruption cases after the enactment of the law. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the KPK Supervisory Board in supervising the institution and its impact on the success of corruption eradication. The method used in this study is a qualitative approach with in-depth interview techniques, document studies, and participant observation. Data were collected from interviews with legal experts, anti-corruption activists, and former KPK employees, as well as analysis of the KPK's annual report and related articles. The results of the study show that although the Dewas aims to increase accountability, its presence actually slows down the KPK's operational processes and reduces the effectiveness of corruption eradication. The Dewas' bureaucratic function risks affecting the KPK's independence, while the politicization of supervision worsens the internal conditions of the institution. This study suggests the need for an in-depth evaluation of the Dewas' role, as well as strengthening the KPK's operational flexibility to be more responsive to corruption. The implications of this study provide an important picture of the challenges faced by the KPK after the revision of the law, as well as recommendations for further research in examining institutional reform in Indonesia.
PERSEPSI GURU DAN SISWA TERHADAP MEDIA WORDWALL SEBAGAI APLIKASI PEMBELAJARAN IPA KELAS VIII DI SMP NEGERI 26 MAKASSAR. Mistahul jannah; Nawir; Akram
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 10 No. 03 (2025): Volume 10 No. 03 September 2025 Build
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v10i03.31496

Abstract

This study aims to explore the perceptions and experiences of teachers andstudents regarding the use of Wordwall as an evaluation medium in eighth-gradescience learning at SMP Negeri 26 Makassar. This study started from the problemof the need to increase student engagement and the effectiveness of feedback intraditional evaluation methods. Conducted for one month starting on March 14,2025, this study used a qualitative approach. Data collection was conductedthrough direct observation of the use of Wordwall in class, in-depth interviews withone science teacher and eight eighth-grade students from different backgrounds,and documentation analysis. Data were analyzed systematically through thestages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. Data validitywas maintained through source triangulation techniques, member checks (dataconfirmation with participants), and audit trails. The results showed that the use ofWordwall as an evaluation medium in the science learning process had a positiveimpact, especially increasing student interactivity and motivation. Both teachersand the majority of students considered this media able to make the evaluationprocess more interesting, interactive, and fun thanks to gamification features suchas quizzes and interactive puzzles, as well as fast automatic feedback. Thissignificantly helped students in understanding science material. However, thisstudy also identified technical challenges in the form of unstable internetconnections and limited devices, which were major barriers to implementation.Students perceptions of the use of Wordwall varied; most reported increasedmotivation and enthusiasm, while others felt the effect was neutral. Somesuggestions for improvement included adding a variety of questions, providingexplanations after completing the questions, and enhancing the interface to makeit more interactive.