Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal NOMOI Law Review Indonesian Journal of Physical Activity
Maulana, Fadli
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Minat Masyarakat Dalam Partisipasi Aktivitas Fisik Di Lapang Merdeka Sukabumi Maulana, Fadli; SeptiadI, Firman; Nugraheni, Wening
Indonesian Journal of Physical Activity Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): November-April
Publisher : PT Mediatama Zayna Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59734/ijpa.v5i1.72

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengethui minat masyarakat dalam partisipasi aktivitas fisik di Lapang Merdeka Sukabumi. Metodologi yang digunakan adalah campuran (mixed-method) yang memadukan metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif yang didukung dengann metode explanatory sequential design (rancangan seksuensial eksplanatori). Sampel penelitian ini adalah masyarakat berusia 16 – 18 tahun yang sedang melakukan aktivitas fisik di lapang Merdeka kota Sukabumi dan diperoleh responden sebanyak 250 orang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penelitian menghasilkan dua hasil dari kuantitatif dan kualitatif, hasil kuantitatif dengan pengukuran kuesioner GPAQ pada aktivitas fisik masyarakat di Lapang Merdeka Kota Sukabumi dibagi pada 3 kategori yaitu kategori rendah sebesar “21%” (21 orang), sedang sebesar “66%” (66 orang) dan tinggi sebesar “13%” (13 orang). Berdasarkan nilai rata-rata, yaitu 1808 aktivitas fisik berada pada kategori sedang karena jarang melakukan aktivitas fisik berat dan sering melakukan aktivitas fisik sedang. Hasil kualitatif menunjukkan dengan metode wawancara mennjukkan bahwa rata-rata sampel memiliki aktivitas fisik dengan kategori sedang karena jarang melakukan aktivitas fisik.
RECONSTRUCTION CONSUMER PROTECTION IN PROPERTY DEVELOPER INSOLVENCY: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL CRITIQUE OF INDONESIA, SINGAPORE, AND AUSTRALIA Maulana, Fadli
NOMOI Law Review Vol 6, No 2 (2025): November Edition
Publisher : NOMOI Law Review

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/nomoi.v6i2.27180

Abstract

Consumer protection in failed property development transactions involving bankrupt developers remains a structural weakness within Indonesia’s legal system. Consumers often face legal and financial burdens, such as ongoing loan obligations, despite project non-performance and lack of priority in bankruptcy proceedings. This study aims to analyze Indonesia’s consumer protection framework in this context using normative-juridical and comparative legal methods, examining best practices from Singapore and Australia. The research finds that Indonesia lacks an integrated regime across contract, consumer, and insolvency law, resulting in fragmented protections and systemic risk to consumers. By contrast, Singapore mandates escrow accounts and standardized sale contracts, while Australia imposes statutory trust accounts, home warranty insurance, and enforceable certification and inspection schemes. Furthermore, both jurisdictions provide institutional redress mechanisms, including tribunals with binding adjudicative authority. The study also highlights actual cases, including the Porter Davis insolvency response and QCAT decisions, that demonstrate the efficacy of coordinated regulatory and adjudicative frameworks. The findings suggest that Indonesia must adopt structural legal reforms, including escrow mandates, recognition of consumers as preferential creditors, and enhanced supervisory institutions. This research is useful for legislators, regulators, and scholars seeking to construct a more equitable, accountable, and resilient consumer protection system in Indonesia’s property sector. 
Co-Authors Firman Septiadi Wening Nugraheni