Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Sensitivitas Antara Antibiotik Meropenem dan Seftazidin Terhadap Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain ATCC 15442 Pada Pasien Pneumonia di RSUP dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta Pusat Diah Lestari; Husyain Djajaningrat; Febri Wulan Dari; Dean Handimulya
Anakes : Jurnal Ilmiah Analis Kesehatan Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): ANAKES: Jurnal Ilmiah Analis Kesehatan
Publisher : Universitas Mohammad Husni Thamrin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37012/anakes.v11i1.2500

Abstract

Pneumonia is an acute lower respiratory tract infection in the lung parenchyma that has a high level of treatment resistance and is a nosocomial bacterial transmission. One of the nosocomial bacteria in hospitals is Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which is a Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) bacteria, a pathogen that causes infections that are resistant to at least three antimicrobial agents. The antimicrobials included are meropenem and ceftazidime, these two antibiotics are the best choice of last-line drugs in the treatment of MDR bacteria. Effective prevention and treatment of bacterial colonization and infection in pneumonia patients needs to be done to reduce the negative impact of antibiotic use. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity between the antibiotics meropenem and ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria in pneumonia patients at RSUPN dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Central Jakarta. The research method was analytical observational using a cross sectional design with medical record data sources on 105 pneumonia patients who underwent sputum culture examination. Data analysis using the Mann-Whitney Test at 95% CI (α = 0.05). The research results showed that the majority of patients were male, 69 people with an elderly age category of 51 people (48.6%). The results of the antibiotic sensitivity of meropenem were 76.25% and ceftazidime were 69.5%, with a p-value of 0.000. The average sensitivity of the antibiotic meropenem is 20.59, more sensitive than the antibiotic ceftazidime, an average of 20.50 with a difference in sensitivity of 9%. The conclusion is that there is a difference in the sensitivity of the antibiotics meropenem and ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria in pneumonia patients at RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Central Jakarta, the antibiotic meropenem is more sensitive than the antibiotic ceftazidime.  Keywords: Meropenem, Pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,  Seftazidim.
Sensitivitas Antara Antibiotik Meropenem dan Seftazidin Terhadap Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain ATCC 15442 Pada Pasien Pneumonia di RSUP dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta Pusat Diah Lestari; Husyain Djajaningrat; Febri Wulan Dari; Dean Handimulya
Anakes : Jurnal Ilmiah Analis Kesehatan Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): ANAKES: Jurnal Ilmiah Analis Kesehatan
Publisher : Universitas Mohammad Husni Thamrin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37012/anakes.v11i1.2500

Abstract

Pneumonia is an acute lower respiratory tract infection in the lung parenchyma that has a high level of treatment resistance and is a nosocomial bacterial transmission. One of the nosocomial bacteria in hospitals is Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which is a Multi Drug Resistant (MDR) bacteria, a pathogen that causes infections that are resistant to at least three antimicrobial agents. The antimicrobials included are meropenem and ceftazidime, these two antibiotics are the best choice of last-line drugs in the treatment of MDR bacteria. Effective prevention and treatment of bacterial colonization and infection in pneumonia patients needs to be done to reduce the negative impact of antibiotic use. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity between the antibiotics meropenem and ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria in pneumonia patients at RSUPN dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Central Jakarta. The research method was analytical observational using a cross sectional design with medical record data sources on 105 pneumonia patients who underwent sputum culture examination. Data analysis using the Mann-Whitney Test at 95% CI (α = 0.05). The research results showed that the majority of patients were male, 69 people with an elderly age category of 51 people (48.6%). The results of the antibiotic sensitivity of meropenem were 76.25% and ceftazidime were 69.5%, with a p-value of 0.000. The average sensitivity of the antibiotic meropenem is 20.59, more sensitive than the antibiotic ceftazidime, an average of 20.50 with a difference in sensitivity of 9%. The conclusion is that there is a difference in the sensitivity of the antibiotics meropenem and ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria in pneumonia patients at RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Central Jakarta, the antibiotic meropenem is more sensitive than the antibiotic ceftazidime.  Keywords: Meropenem, Pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,  Seftazidim.
Uji Diagnostik Lipoarabinomannan Urin untuk Deteksi Mycobacterium tuberculosis pada Pasien Dengan dan Tanpa Infeksi HIV Andriana Kirana Puspa; Dean Handimulya
Indonesia Journal of Chest Critical Emergency Medicine Vol 12 No 2 (2025): Uji Diagnostik Lipoarabinomannan Urin untuk Deteksi Mycobacterium tuberculosis p
Publisher : PERPARI (Perhimpunan Respirologi Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background Most of the tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic tests rely on sputum samples, which are often difficult to obtain in children, patients with extrapulmonary TB and people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLHIV). Lipoarabinomanan (LAM), a major component of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) cell wall, function as a virulence factor and can enter the systemic circulation during infection. Due to its relatively small molecular size, LAM is filtered by the kidneys and can detected in urine. Detection of urinary LAM antigen offers a non invasive and rapid diagnostic approach that can be performed as appoint of care test (POCT), providing a promising tool for TB diagnosis, especially in individuals with difficulty producing sputum or those who are immunocompromised, such as PLHIV. Method A cross-sectional study was conducted at dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital involving 96 subjects with suspected tuberculosis (TB), with or without Human deficiency Virus (HIV) infection. Urine samples were tested using Abbott Determineä TB LAM Ag, a lateral flow immunoassay for detecting lipoarabinomannan antigen. Diagnostic performance was compared with a composite reference standard, define as appositive result in at least one of the following tests: real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), acid-fast bacilli smear, or acid-fast bacilli culture. Numeric data were tested for normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and presented as median (range), while categorical data were expressed as absolute frequency (n) and percentage (%). Diagnostic performance was assessed in terms of sensitivity, specifity, predictive values, and accuracy. Result Among 96 subjects, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the urinary LAM test compared with bacteriological TB results were 51%, 68%, 46%, and 73%, respectively. In 33 participants with HIV infection, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 54%, 59%, 40%, and 72%, respectively. In 63 participants without HIV, the sensitivity and PPV were both 50%, while specificity and NPV were 73%. The urinary LAM test demonstrated moderate diagnostic performance, with slightly higher sensitivity among patients with HIV infection compared to those without. CONCLUSION: The urinary LAM test is a rapid and simple diagnostic tool for tuberculosis. It demonstrated moderate diagnostic performance, with higher sensitivity among patients with HIV infection compared to those without, suggesting greater utility as an adjunct diagnostic test in this population. Keywords: Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Lipoarabinomannan, Tuberculosis, Point of care testing, Urine