Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Referendum Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Tasya Darosyifa
Unknown Affiliation
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia dan Malaysia Tasya Darosyifa; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i2.1819

Abstract

Corruption remains a serious issue that hinders development and erodes public trust in the government, particularly in countries like Indonesia and Malaysia. Both nations have long histories of dealing with systemic corruption. This study aims to compare the legal systems and anti-corruption law enforcement in Indonesia and Malaysia to identify challenges and areas for improvement. The research uses a descriptive qualitative method with a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, analyzing legal documents, academic journals, and regulations related to anti-corruption agencies in both countries. This study employs legal system theory and institutional theory. The main problem examined is how anti-corruption law enforcement differs between Indonesia and Malaysia and what the main enforcement challenges are. The findings show that while Indonesia’s Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) was once powerful, recent political interference and regulatory revisions have weakened its impact. Conversely, Malaysia has more comprehensive legal instruments, but its enforcement agencies struggle with independence and political pressure. In conclusion, both countries must strengthen legal supremacy, institutional independence, and public engagement to enhance the effectiveness of anti-corruption efforts.
Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Internasional antara Industri Berbeda Tasya Darosyifa; Ligina Tesalonika; Ariel Lois; Angel Evelyn; Aditama Candra Kusuma; Irwan Triadi; Iwan Erar Joesoef
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v2i2.727

Abstract

International trademark infringement poses a complex challenge for brand owners due to jurisdictional variations and differing legal systems across countries. This study examines available legal remedies, ranging from non-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms such as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) - encompassing negotiation, mediation, and arbitration - to formal litigation in national courts. ADR offers advantages in time efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and confidentiality, while litigation provides legal certainty through binding court decisions such as injunctions and damages awards. Preventive strategies including international trademark registration through the Madrid System and cooperation with customs authorities serve as crucial proactive protection measures. Furthermore, this research analyzes judicial considerations in cross-industry trademark disputes, including assessment of trademark similarity (visual, phonetic, conceptual), reputation of well-known marks, bad faith of infringers, and potential consumer confusion. Case studies such as Louis Vuitton vs. Louis Vuitton Dak and Zara Food vs. Zara Fashion demonstrate judicial application of the likelihood of confusion principle and anti-dilution doctrine even across different industries. The research employs normative legal methodology with statutory and secondary document analysis approaches. Findings confirm that legal strategy selection must consider infringement scale, jurisdiction, and business objectives, while international trademark protection requires integration of proactive registration, legal enforcement, and comprehensive understanding of global market dynamics.
Pancasila as a Legal Political Paradigm: Implications for the Judicial System and Law Enforcement in Indonesia Albert Limbong Sintong; Tasya Darosyifa
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): November: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v2i4.4287

Abstract

Pancasila as a grundnorm plays an important role in the legal political paradigm in Indonesia as the basis for the formation of the legal system. All laws in Indonesia must be based on Pancasila as the source of all legal sources. The main issue studied is the extent to which Pancasila influences the legislative process and legal policies to realize a fair judicial system, as well as how its values can reform the judicial system and improve the quality of law enforcement. This study uses a normative method with a conceptual approach supported by the analysis of the hierarchy theory of legal norms and development law. The results of the study show that although Pancasila has been recognized as a grundnorm in the legal hierarchy, its implementation in legislation and legal policies still often faces obstacles, so a more responsive and inclusive legal system reform based on Pancasila values is needed.
Co-Authors Aditama Candra Kusuma Albert Limbong Sintong Angel Evelyn Ariel Lois Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Irwan Triadi Iwan Erar Joesoef Ligina Tesalonika