Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Bukhari: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis El Nubuwwah Jurnal Studi Hadis
Husna, Himmayatul
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Interpretasi Hadis Qadhā’ Puasa Mayit menurut Metodologi Yusuf al-Qaradawi Husna, Himmayatul; Khamim, Khamim
El Nubuwwah Jurnal Studi Hadis Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Volume 3 No. 1 June 2025
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Dakwah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/elnubuwwah.v3i1.17530

Abstract

This study explores the divergent interpretations among Muslim scholars regarding prophetic traditions (ḥadīths) associated with the legal obligation of qadhā’ (paying back the missed fasting) on behalf of deceased individuals. The disagreement emerges from the categorization of ritual worship (ʿibādah) into physical, financial, or combined acts, raising jurisprudential debates over whether such acts—especially fasting—can be fulfilled by legal proxy. Within Islamic legal discourse, some jurists argue that the guardian (walī) must perform the missed fasts of the deceased, while others opine that paying fidyah (compensatory feeding of the poor) is sufficient. These divergent views stem from differing hermeneutical readings of several ḥadīths, including those reported by ʿĀʾishah and Ibn ʿAbbās, which appear contradictory in literal interpretation. This research employs a qualitative methodology using a library-based (literature review) approach, analyzing hadith and fiqh texts across multiple legal schools (madhāhib). The interpretive framework of Yūsuf al-Qaradāwī is utilized to critically assess and reconcile these texts, incorporating key principles such as jamʿu al-aḥādīth (harmonization), tarjīḥ (preference of evidence), and asbāb al-wurūd (contextual background of narration). The study finds that al-Qaradāwī’s comprehensive approach to hadith interpretation allows for a more coherent understanding of scholarly disagreements and offers a rational foundation for legal rulings across schools. It concludes that methodological engagement with prophetic texts is essential in developing inclusive, adaptable, and well-reasoned Islamic legal judgments in the context of modern jurisprudential needs.
The Dichotomy in Evaluating Hadiths on the Dajjal's Tribulation: Analysis of Tirmidzi's Hasan Sahih Hadith vs Albani's Critique Husna, Himmayatul; Najib Junaidi
Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Al-Bukhari: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin Adab dan Dakwah IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/al-bukhari.v8i1.9375

Abstract

This article discusses the dichotomy in the evaluation of hadiths regarding the tribulation (fitnah) of the Dajjal, focusing on the differing assessments between Tirmidzi’s classification of a hadith as hasan sahih and the critique presented by Shaykh Muhammad Nasiruddin Albani. This approach aims to understand the differences in methodology and criteria used by these two scholars in hadith evaluation, as well as the implications for the authenticity and validity of the hadiths related to the Dajjal's tribulation. Through a comparative study, the article highlights the importance of contextual hadith evaluation in determining its status within the science of hadith and its implications for Islamic eschatology. The study concludes that Albani deemed the hadith dhaif because its content contradicts stronger narrations. In contrast, Tirmidzi’s classification of the hadith as hasan sahih suggests that such contradictions can be reconciled. This preference for reconciliation rather than prioritizing one narration over another aligns with the view of the majority of scholars who have commented on the hadith. The findings indicate that this difference in evaluation reflects diverse methodologies and emphases, underscoring the need for a critical and holistic approach in assessing hadiths related to the Dajjal’s tribulation
Co-Authors Khamim, Khamim Najib Junaidi