Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PERNIKAHAN PADA GELAHANG : SOLUSI KULTURA UNTUK PASANGAN ANAK TUNGGAL DI BALI Suarsa, Agus Wisnuwardhana; Oktavia, Widya; Silaban, Kenjiro Adriano
Ensiklopedia Sosial Review Vol 7, No 2 (2025): Volume 7 No 2 Juni 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/esr.v7i2.3101

Abstract

Abstract: This paper aims to analyze the legal implications of the Perkawinan Pada Gelahang (bilateral marriage) from the perspective of positive law. The main issue lies in the perceived injustice in inheritance distribution. The research question addresses the legal consequences arising from this marriage practice in terms of spousal status, inheritance rights, and child protection. This article adopts a normative approach, utilizing primary legal sources such as Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage, along with relevant academic journals as secondary legal materials. The study concludes that Perkawinan Pada Gelahang is conducted in accordance with Hindu teachings, wherein both husband and wife bear dual responsibilities: Niskala obligations, which involve religious ceremonies at both families’ temples, and Sekala obligations, which refer to social duties in each of the spouses’ Desa Pakraman (customary villages). From the standpoint of positive law, legal issues emerge—particularly regarding inheritance—since both spouses are considered equal, with neither being dominant in terms of "giving" or "receiving" status. This equality creates ambiguity in determining legal rights, especially in matters of inheritance and child protection. Keywords: Marriage, Gelahang, Tradition
PERNIKAHAN PADA GELAHANG : SOLUSI KULTURA UNTUK PASANGAN ANAK TUNGGAL DI BALI Suarsa, Agus Wisnuwardhana; Oktavia, Widya; Silaban, Kenjiro Adriano
Ensiklopedia Sosial Review Vol 7, No 2 (2025): Volume 7 No 2 Juni 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/esr.v7i2.3276

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the legal implications of the Perkawinan Pada Gelahang (bilateral marriage) from the perspective of positive law. The main issue lies in the perceived injustice in inheritance distribution. The research question addresses the legal consequences arising from this marriage practice in terms of spousal status, inheritance rights, and child protection. This article adopts a normative approach, utilizing primary legal sources such as Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage, along with relevant academic journals as secondary legal materials. The study concludes that Perkawinan Pada Gelahang is conducted in accordance with Hindu teachings, wherein both husband and wife bear dual responsibilities: Niskala obligations, which involve religious ceremonies at both families’ temples, and Sekala obligations, which refer to social duties in each of the spouses’ Desa Pakraman (customary villages). From the standpoint of positive law, legal issues emerge—particularly regarding inheritance—since both spouses are considered equal, with neither being dominant in terms of "giving" or "receiving" status. This equality creates ambiguity in determining legal rights, especially in matters of inheritance and child protection.Keywords: Marriage, Gelahang, Tradition.
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA BISNIS MELALUI ARBITRASE: PERBANDINGAN EFISIENSI EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN ARBITRASE DI INDONESIA DAN SINGAPURA: Business Dispute Resolution through Arbitration: A Comparative Study of the Enforcement Efficiency of Arbitral Awards in Indonesia and Singapore Silaban, Kenjiro Adriano
Jurnal Globalisasi Hukum. Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Globalisasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/jgh.v2i2.23267

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to compare the effectiveness of Singapore's and Indonesia's enforcement of arbitral awards. The main problem is the procedural obstacles that both jurisdictions' arbitration-based dispute settlement processes face. This article answers the following legal questions: what factors affect the execution of arbitral award enforcement in Indonesia and Singapore, and why Indonesian parties typically choose the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) over the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) for arbitral disputes. Using a normative legal method, this study supports the secondary legal framework with primary legal materials such the 1958 UNCITRAL Model Law, the Indonesian Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Act (AAPS), the BANI Arbitration Rules, and legal periodicals. According to the article's conclusion, Indonesian parties favor SIAC as an arbitration venue because of its more effective enforcement and procedural procedures. However, because arbitrators may not fully comprehend Indonesian law, this choice could result in misunderstanding. Furthermore, because there is less judicial interference, no necessity to record arbitral awards with the local court, and few grounds for annulment under Singaporean law, the implementation of arbitral awards in Singapore is more feasible than in Indonesia.