Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tanggung Jawab Hukum Perusahaan Terhadap Hak Karyawan Dalam Program Dana Pensiun Mustari Efendi; Wiradhika Wicaksono; Diana Ria W. Napitupulu
Journal Scientific of Mandalika (JSM) e-ISSN 2745-5955 | p-ISSN 2809-0543 Vol. 6 No. 8 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/10.36312/vol6iss8pp2196-2203

Abstract

The pension fund program or Pension Guarantee aims to maintain a decent standard of living for workers and their heirs by providing income after participants reach retirement age, experience permanent total disability or die. Pension Guarantee as a form of protection for workers in Indonesia that must be implemented by every employer or company. In principle, pension funds are one alternative to provide welfare guarantees to employees. This study aims to gain an understanding of employee rights in the pension guarantee program and the company's legal responsibility for employee rights in the pension fund program to improve worker welfare when they reach retirement age. The research uses a descriptive analytical research method that describes facts in the form of secondary data consisting of primary legal materials (legislation), secondary legal materials with a normative legal approach, namely a method that uses secondary data sources, namely laws and regulations, legal theories and opinions of scholars, which are then analyzed. Based on research, it was found that there are still workers or employees who are not registered for pension insurance by the Company. Pension insurance is an employee's right, so that not registering employees in a pension insurance program can cause legal protection problems for workers when they enter retirement age, experience permanent total disability or die. While on the other hand, companies that have intentionally or negligently not included employees in the pension insurance program can be held legally responsible either civilly or even criminally based on applicable laws and regulations.
Analisis Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Milik Atas Tanah Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria Mustari Efendi; Syaiful Arifin; Diana Ria W. Napitupulu
Journal Scientific of Mandalika (JSM) e-ISSN 2745-5955 | p-ISSN 2809-0543 Vol. 6 No. 8 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/10.36312/vol6iss8pp2089-2097

Abstract

Land has a very important position in human life which can be seen because of the fact, namely it is used as a place to live, a place to be born, a place to earn a living, a place to be buried, and also as a place for ancestors. Therefore, every land must have legal certainty and certainty of rights for its owner, so that there are no disputes over land rights. Efforts towards legal certainty in terms of obtaining land ownership rights are stated in Article 19 of the Basic Agrarian Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles which requires the Government to carry out land registration and land certification. The goal is that parties who wish to obtain land ownership rights can easily find out the status and area of ​​the land they wish to own, or that has been owned for certainty of rights in order to avoid land conflicts and disputes. This study uses a descriptive analytical research method that describes facts in the form of secondary data consisting of primary legal basic materials (legislation), secondary legal materials with a normative legal approach, namely a method that uses secondary data sources, namely laws and regulations, legal theories and opinions of scholars, which are then analyzed. Based on the research results, it was found that problems often arise such as negligence by land buyers who control land plots only by holding a Deed of Sale and Purchase as proof of ownership of land rights, without going through the administration of land ownership certificates at the land office. Thus, the legal analysis carried out by the Author in this study is to review the extent of efforts to resolve land ownership.