Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

REPRESENTASI PEREMPUAN DI PARLEMEN: STUDI PERBANDINGAN KEBERHASILAN KUOTA GENDER DI INDONESIA DAN SWEDIA Hasanah, Rizka Luluatul; Zalvadhia, Nabila Kheisya; Mulyady, Santi; Nurdin, Nurdin
Jurnal Multidisipliner Kapalamada Vol. 4 No. 02 (2025): JURNAL MULTIDISIPLINER KAPALAMADA
Publisher : Pusat Studi Ekonomi, Publikasi Ilmiah dan Pengembangan SDM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62668/kapalamada.v4i02.1566

Abstract

Women's representation in parliament is a key indicator in assessing the quality of democracy and gender equality in a country. This study compares the effectiveness of gender quota policies between Indonesia and Sweden to identify the factors contributing to their success or failure. Indonesia has formally implemented a 30% gender quota since 2004, yet its enforcement remains largely administrative and has not led to a significant increase in either the quantity or quality of female legislators. In contrast, Sweden has achieved nearly 50% female representation in parliament without a formal quota law, relying instead on voluntary political party commitments, a closed-list proportional electoral system, and an egalitarian political culture. This research employs a comparative qualitative approach using literature review as the primary data source. Findings indicate that the success of women’s political representation is not solely determined by legal quotas but is strongly influenced by structural party commitment, cultural support, and internal mechanisms such as the zipper system. The study recommends electoral system reform, capacity building for female politicians, and a cultural shift in political paradigms in Indonesia to ensure that gender quotas function as substantive affirmative action rather than symbolic compliance.
HEGEMONI DAN IDENTITAS POLITIK: ANALISIS DEMOKRASI RADIKAL LACLAU & MOUFFE PADA POLARISASI PEMILU 2024 Zalvadhia, Nabila Kheisya; Nuraeni, Silvia; Anisti, Caritas Nadya; Sinaga, Kezia Marlinata; Ilmar, Anwar; Bolqiah, Luthfi Hasanal
Jurnal Multidisiplin Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): April
Publisher : PT. ANAN PUBLISHER CENDEKIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70585/jmsh.v3i1.188

Abstract

Studi ini menyelidiki dinamika polarisasi pada Pemilu 2024 melalui kacamata teori Demokrasi Radikal Ernesto Laclau dan Chantal Mouffe. Penelitian ini berargumen bahwa kontestasi elektoral tersebut bukan sekadar kompetisi preferensi suara, melainkan pertarungan diskursif untuk membangun batas politik (political frontier) yang memisahkan identitas "Kami" dan "Mereka". Dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif melalui pendekatan analisis wacana kritis, penelitian ini membedah bagaimana hegemoni dikonstruksi melalui narasi antagonistik antara kubu "Perubahan" dan "Keberlanjutan". Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hegemoni kekuasaan berhasil dibentuk melalui mekanisme rantai ekivalensi (chain of equivalence), di mana simbol "Gemoy" berfungsi sebagai penanda kosong (empty signifier) yang efektif menyatukan basis pemilih yang beragam sekaligus mengaburkan kritik substantif. Lebih jauh, studi ini menyoroti kegagalan transformasi konflik dari antagonisme menuju agonisme pasca-pemilu. Intervensi kekuasaan yang mencederai etika hukum serta manuver koalisi gemuk yang mematikan fungsi oposisi telah menghilangkan unsur penyeimbang (constitutive outside), yang berujung pada kemunduran kualitas demokrasi atau "matinya politik".