Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Legal Politics Changes to The Periodization of The Term of Office of The Village Head Based on Law Number 3 of 2024 Second Amendment to Law Number 6 of 2014 Concerning Villages Ananta, Ahmad Rizal Roby
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v5i4.51121

Abstract

This study examines the recent amendments in Law Number 3 of 2024, which revises Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages, particularly regarding the extension of the village head’s term from 6 years with a maximum of 3 periods to 8 years with a maximum of 2 periods. The change, influenced by demands from village heads, has sparked significant debate due to the lack of clear legal justification supporting it. This research aims to assess the rationale behind this change and its potential implications on village governance, particularly its effects on leadership effectiveness, power concentration, and community impact. Using both a statute approach to analyze the legal texts and a conceptual approach to explore the broader political and governance implications, the study finds that while the extended tenure may offer continuity and more time for village heads to implement their programs, it also raises concerns about political dynasties and potential misuse of power. The study suggests that although longer terms may improve governance, careful consideration is needed to balance this with democratic values. The findings provide crucial insights for policymakers, underscoring the potential risks and benefits of this legal reform in strengthening or weakening local democratic processes and governance.
Criminal Limitations on Diversion of Children Against the Law Based on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System from a Comparative Perspective Ananta, Ahmad Rizal Roby; Wicaksono, Demas Brian; Berliansyah, Devi Tri; Lestari, Dewi
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jphk.v6i2.26234

Abstract

This research explores the protection of children’s rights within the criminal justice system, with a particular focus on the legal constraints surrounding the use of diversion for children in conflict with the law (ABH), as regulated by Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA). While the Indonesian Constitution and international legal frameworks—such as the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), ratified through Presidential Decree Number 36 of 1990—guarantee these rights, challenges persist in their implementation, especially during legal proceedings. The study employs a normative legal method, incorporating comparative and conceptual approaches, by examining how Indonesia’s diversion system compares with Finland’s and Sweden’s. The findings indicated that despite Indonesia’s adoption of restorative justice principles in the  Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (CJSC), the practical application of diversion remains hindered by several factors. These include a lack of understanding among legal practitioners, inadequate rehabilitation facilities, and limited victim involvement in resolving cases. Furthermore, the restriction of diversion to crimes carrying sentences of less than seven years fails to fully uphold the principle of prioritizing the child’s best interests. While earlier research has analyzed diversion in terms of recidivism rates and law enforcement implementation, this study emphasizes the principle of non-discrimination within Indonesia’s juvenile justice system. As a result, the study advocates for more comprehensive policy reforms to broaden the scope of diversion, better align with restorative justice principles, and ensure stronger protection for children entangled in legal conflicts.
Memperkuat Pajak Karbon: Menerapkan Perjanjian Paris dan Ekonomi Hijau di Indonesia Ananta, Ahmad RIzal Roby; Abidin, Ahmad Dzaki; Jhoncilla, Iqbal Aryawidya
Hang Tuah Law Journal VOLUME 9 ISSUE 2, OCTOBER 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hang Tuah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/htlj.v9i1.282

Abstract

Climate change triggered by greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels is increasingly threatening the ecosystem and the global economy. A carbon tax is one of the policy instruments implemented in various countries, including Indonesia, to reduce emissions and encourage the transition to a green economy. Indonesia adopted this policy through Law No. 7 of 2021 on Carbon Taxes, with an initial rate of IDR 30 per kg CO₂e (USD 2 per ton CO₂e), making it one of the lowest in the world. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the carbon tax policy in Indonesia by comparing it with Sweden. This country has implemented a carbon tax since 1991 and has succeeded in reducing emissions by 27%. This study uses a normative approach with comparative law, statutory, and conceptual approaches. Data were collected from primary regulations, scientific journals, and international reports related to carbon taxes. The results show that the implementation of the carbon tax in Indonesia still faces various obstacles, such as low rates, dependence on fossil fuels, and suboptimal carbon trading mechanisms.