Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Legal Fremwork and practice of Using Intellectual Property Right as Fiduciary Collateral in Indonesia : Challengs and Solution Fahmi Ihsan Margolang; Fenny Fenny
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v2i4.1078

Abstract

This paper examines the legal framework and practical implementation of using Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) as fiduciary collateral in Indonesia. The study identifies existing legal uncertainties and administrative challenges that hinder the optimization of IPRs as collateral objects, such as the absence of technical implementation regulations and limited awareness among stakeholders. Through normative legal analysis supported by empirical evidence, this research explores how the current fiduciary security law can be adapted to better accommodate IPRs, highlighting the potential for IPRs to enhance access to finance, particularly for creative economy actors. The paper also presents solutions, including the need for clear implementing regulations, capacity-building among stakeholders, and stronger coordination among government institutions. Ultimately, the research emphasizes the strategic importance of integrating IPRs into financial mechanisms and proposes actionable steps for regulatory and institutional reform.
Sistem Pengawasan Profesi Notaris di Indonesia dan Belanda: Studi Komparatif atas Mekanisme Akuntabilitas dan Etika Jabatan Fahmi Ihsan Margolang; Dewi Mayaningsih
Desentralisasi : Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, dan Pemerintahan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Agustus : Desentralisasi : Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, dan Pemerintahan
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/desentralisasi.v2i3.838

Abstract

This study examines the comparative supervision systems of notarial professions in Indonesia and the Netherlands using a normative and comparative legal approach. In Indonesia, notary supervision is centralized under the Ministry of Law and Human Rights through supervisory councils, yet remains weak in terms of independence and transparency. In contrast, the Netherlands adopts a decentralized and independent model through institutions such as the KNB, the Notarial Disciplinary Board, and the BFT, which ensure accountability and public oversight. The findings reveal that the Dutch system is more effective in enforcing professional ethics and preventing conflicts of interest through mandatory reporting and peer evaluations. The study suggests reforming Indonesia’s supervisory framework by strengthening institutional independence, enhancing the role of professional associations, and ensuring greater transparency. This research aims to contribute to the development of a more accountable and integrity-based notarial supervision system in civil law jurisdictions.