Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Wawasan yang Dapat Ditindaklanjuti tentang Kebijakan Unit Pengelolaan Utang untuk Obligasi Regional dan Lingkungan Bisnis yang Efektif: Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dan Meksiko Dwiputrianti, Septiana; Ardian, Bahril Putra; Kadelbach, Vivian
Jurnal Bina Praja Vol 17 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Research and Development Agency Ministry of Home Affairs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21787/jbp.17.2025.103-119

Abstract

Effective public policy debt management through Debt Management Units (DMUs) is essential for regional governance and economic development. Compared with Mexico, the study focuses on actionable policy insights and the importance of DMUs in effective regional bond issuance and business environment improvement in Indonesia. The primary objective is to enhance the operational effectiveness of DMUs to facilitate successful bond issuance and improve the local business environment. The study used a qualitative research methodology to gather comprehensive insights and involved semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, observations, and document analysis. Findings reveal that DMUs are crucial in coordinating debt strategies and managing risks; however, their effectiveness is often compromised by inadequate human resources, unclear organizational structures, and regulatory constraints. The study proposes actionable solutions, such as investing in human resource development, establishing clear Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), and advocating for balanced regulatory reforms. These findings contribute significantly to public governance and policy by highlighting the importance of enhancing DMU performance for sustainable economic growth. The research emphasizes a multifaceted approach integrating human resource capacity, organizational clarity, and stakeholder engagement. By addressing the specific context of local government, this study provides valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners, promoting effective public finance management and fostering a favorable investment climate. The proposed recommendations aim to empower DMUs, ensuring they can fulfil their vital regional governance and economic development functions.
Governance Models and Stunting: Comparative Policy Insights from Indonesia, Malaysia, and Mexico Dwiputrianti, Septiana; Balian, Moch. Ubaidillah; Arshad, Rozita; Kadelbach, Vivian; Abdullah, Sait
Jurnal Borneo Administrator Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : Puslatbang KDOD Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24258/jba.v21i3.1710

Abstract

162 million children worldwide are affected by stunting, which has serious societal repercussions (WHO, 2021). In order to identify institutional drivers of success, this study compares the governance styles used to address stunting in Mexico (hybrid), Malaysia (centralised), and Indonesia (decentralised). Through a qualitative examination of 45 coverage documents (2015–2023) and 72 stakeholder interviews, we find that Malaysia's NPAN uses cross-regional cooperation to reduce stunting by 12%, while Indonesia's bureaucratic fragmentation hinders implementation. The importance of network engagement is emphasized in Mexico's PENSAN application. By showing how adaptive frameworks that are adapted to local capacities improve fitness outcomes, the study advances the idea of collaborative governance. Malaysia is a prime example of a collaborative governance model that involves a fewstakeholders and improves its national nutrition strategy. Mexico's comprehensive strategy, which combines health and social regulations, underscores the significance of community engagement in public health initiatives. A comparative analysis of stunting incidence indicates that Indonesia (20.0%) and Malaysia (24.3%) face significant challenges in reducing stunting rates, whereas Mexico (13.9%) has made greater progress in this area. This study gives contribution to the study of public administration by illustrating how centralized (Malaysia), decentralized (Indonesia), and hybrid (Mexico) governance systems influence the effectiveness of health interventions. It provides critical insights for policymakers and practitioners, advocating for inclusive stakeholder participation and the necessity of context specific solutions. This study redefines discussions on decentralization in global health governance and fills the gap on cross-national governance analyses in stunting policy. This study indicates that policymakers ought to promote institutional flexibility and participatory design to attain SDG objectives.