Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Sultan : Riset Hukum Tata Negara as-Shahifah
Wasil Haqqullah, Moh.
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 1999 Terhadap Independensi Kebebasan Pers Pada Kasus Jurnalis Tempo Wasil Haqqullah, Moh.; Ulfa Safira
As-Shahifah : Journal of Constitutional Law and Governance Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah Univeritas Islam Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/asshahifah.v5i1.19454

Abstract

Pers merupakan the fourth estate kekuasaan keempat di dalam negara yang menganut sistem demokrasi untuk mengontrol jalannya sistem pemerintahan, di Indonesia jaminan terhadap pers masih jauh dari adopsi sistem demokrasi. Pers secara peraturan perundang-undangan dijamin kebebasannya/independensinya. Namun jaminan tersebut tidak dirasakan oleh Tempo yang pada saat meliput tentang revisi Undang-Undang TNI di intimidasi oleh seseorang. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan fenomenologis, adapun pengumpulan sumber data penelitian berupa: buku, jurnal, peraturan perundang-undangan terkait, wawancara dan hasil observasi. Hasil penelitian ini menguraikan tentang implikasi undang-undang Pers terhadap jaminan independensi, peran pemerintah dalam merespon kasus Tempo dan yang terakhir menguraikan tentang perspektif konstitusi terhadap independensi Pers di Indonesia. Kesimpulannya berupa adanya ketidaksesuaian sistem demokrasi yang di anut Indonesia terhadap kekerasan Pers yang terjadi akhir-akhir ini. Kata Kunci: Independen, Pers, Konstitusi.
The Constitutional Interpretation of Constitutional Court Decision Number 128/PUU-XXIII/2025 Regarding The Prohibition of Ministers and Deputy Ministers Holding Multiple Positions in Indonesia Wasil Haqqullah, Moh.
JURNAL SULTAN: Riset Hukum Tata Negara Volume 4 Nomor 1 Oktober 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/sultan_htn.v4i1.15125

Abstract

Indonesia is a country that adopts a presidential system of government. In this system, an elected President is assisted by Ministers and Deputy Ministers in carrying out state duties. This is affirmed in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, Article 17, paragraphs (1) to (3). However, the problem with these Ministers and Deputy Ministers in the current government is that 32 Ministers and Deputy Ministers hold dual positions in state-owned enterprises and other institutions, such as political parties. The prohibition on dual office-holding for Ministers and Deputy Ministers is regulated by Law No. 39 of 2008 concerning State Ministries, Article 23, which explicitly prohibits Ministers from holding dual office. This is further addressed in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 128/PUU-XXIII/2025 regarding the prohibition on dual office-holding for Ministers and Deputy Ministers. Based on the background of the problem, the author formulates the research question: How can the principles of good governance of state institutions be realized? What are the constitutional losses for civil society regarding Ministers and Deputy Ministers who hold dual positions in SOEs and Political Parties? What is the ratio decidendi of the Constitutional Court Justices regarding Decision No. 128/PUU-XIII/2025? This type of research uses normative research, and the research approaches are the statute approach and the case approach. The results of this study indicate that conflicts of interest arising from ministers and deputy ministers holding multiple positions will lead to abuse of power, thereby negatively impacting good governance. Dual office-holding often leads to conflicts of interest between the positions of Minister and Deputy Minister and structural positions in state-owned enterprises and political parties. Thus, this phenomenon of dual office-holding will affect performance in the duties and functions of each ministry, and will not comply with applicable laws and regulations.
Co-Authors Ulfa Safira