Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Shariah and Justice Kalosara: Family Law Review El 'Aailah AHKAM : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora
Abd. Rouf
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
HADHĀNAH BAGI SUAMI AKIBAT ISTRI MURTAD PERSPEKTIF KAIDAH DAR’ MAFĀSID : STUDI ANALISIS PUTUSAN Al Awshat, Muhammad Ali; Abd. Rouf
Indonesian Journal of Shariah and Justice Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Program Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Ternate

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46339/ijsj.v5i1.181

Abstract

Inthe. case. ofcustody(hadhanah)due. toapostate. wife.,the.re. are. twoconflictinginte.re.sts.On the. one. hand, childre.n ne.e.d close.ne.ss to the.ir mothe.r as the. main figure. in the.ir upbringing since. childhood.Howe.ve.r,onthe. othe.rhand,the.re. isaconce.rnthatifthe. childiscare.dforby a mothe.r who has apostatize.d, he.r faith and re.ligious unde.rstanding may be. affe.cte.d. This cre.ate.s a dile.mma be.twe.e.n maintaining the. child's e.motional bond with his mothe.r and maintaining his re.ligious be.lie.fs and e.ducation. One. of the. fiqh rule.s that is re.le.vant in this conte.xt is dar' al-mafāsid muqaddam a'lā jalb al-mashālih, which state.s that re.je.cting harm must take. pre.ce.de.nce. ove.r achie.ving be.ne.fit. This study aims to analyze. the. judge.'s conside.ration in de.te.rmining child custody in divorce. case.s due. to apostate. wive.s in the. Re.ligiousCourt.Withnormative. juridicalme.thodandcase. approach.The. re.sultsshowe.dthat the. judge. re.fe.rre.dtothe. opinionsofthe. Shafi'iyyahandHanafiyyahscholars,whoe.mphasize.d that child custody must be. give.n to Muslim pare.nts. Base.d on the. rule. of dar' al-mafāsid muqaddam a'lā jalb al-mashālih, the. judge. de.cide.d to give. custody to the. fathe.r to maintain the. child's faith and re.ligious e.ducation.
KOMPARASI AKIBAT TIDAK TERCATATNYA PERKAWINAN INDONESIA DAN PAKISTAN: STUDI REFORMASI HUKUM INDONESIA PERSPEKTIF MASLAHAH MURSALAH: Studi Reformasi Hukum Indonesia Perspektif Maslahah Mursalah Moh. Umar Fadlil; Abd. Rouf
El 'Ailaah Vol 5 No 1 (2026): El 'Aailah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Keluarga
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga (Ahwal Syakhshiyah)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59270/aailah.v5i1.369

Abstract

Unregistered marriages are an important issue in contemporary Islamic family law because they have a direct impact on the protection of the rights of husbands, wives, and children. In Indonesia, this practice still occurs due to the separation between the validity of marriage according to religion and the state's obligation to register it, thus creating legal uncertainty and weak protection of family rights. In contrast, Pakistan implements stricter marriage registration regulations through the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (MFLO) 1961, accompanied by legal sanctions, which are more effective in maintaining order and protecting family law. This study aims to compare the legal consequences of unregistered marriages in Indonesia and Pakistan and formulate their implications for Indonesian marriage law reform from the perspective of maslahah mursalah. Through the perspective of maslahah mursalah, this research aims to formulate a normative basis and recommendations for reforming Indonesian marriage law so that marriage registration is not merely positioned as an administrative obligation, but as a legal mechanism that guarantees the welfare, justice, and protection of vulnerable parties within the family. The method used is normative legal research with a comparative and conceptual approach through a literature study. The results of the study show that the absence of registration and strict sanctions in Indonesia weakens the protection of the rights of wives and children, while the Pakistani system better guarantees legal certainty. This study emphasizes the need to strengthen marriage registration regulations in Indonesia in order to achieve justice, legal certainty, and family welfare. 
Substantive Inequality in Article 116 (b) and (c) of the Kompilasi Hukum Islam: A Rawlsian Analysis of Divorce Law Reform Muhammad Danias Salsabila; Abd. Rouf; Syaikhoni
KALOSARA: Family Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Kalosara: Family Law Review
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31332/kalosara.v6i1.13903

Abstract

The regulation of divorce grounds in Article 116 of the Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI), particularly letters (b) and (c), reveals a temporal disparity that affects parties’ access to justice. Although widely discussed in normative and judicial contexts, studies applying a Rawlsian framework especially the difference principle remain limited. This study examines whether these temporal differences constitute substantive inequality and whether they are normatively justifiable. Using normative legal (doctrinal) research with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study operationalizes John Rawls’ theory of justice as an evaluative framework to assess the distribution of legal protection for the least advantaged. The findings show that the disparity between Article 116 (b) and (c) reflects substantive inequality, as it applies inconsistent time- and status-based parameters to situations that are essentially similar, namely the failure to fulfill marital obligations. Such inequality cannot be fully justified under the difference principle, as it may prolong or generalize the harm suffered by disadvantaged parties. Accordingly, this study argues for a shift from a formally time-based approach toward one based on substantive impact, to ensure that divorce law is more responsive in protecting vulnerable individuals. Keywords: Article 116; Divorce; John Rawls’ Theory of Justice; Kompilasi Hukum Islam.
Wasiat Wajibah sebagai Instrumen Perlindungan Hak Ahli Waris Beda Agama: Studi Komparatif Indonesia dan Negara-Negara Muslim dalam Perspektif Keadilan Hukum Nadya Artika Maulani; Abd. Rouf
AHKAM Vol 5 No 3 (2026): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10671

Abstract

Religious difference is one of the impediments to inheritance in Islamic law, which causes non-Muslim heirs not to obtain inheritance rights from Muslim testators. In its development, a number of Muslim countries have developed the concept of wasiat wajibah as a legal protection instrument for parties who are barred from receiving inheritance. This study aims to analyze the regulation of wasiat wajibah for heirs of different religions in Indonesia and Muslim countries, identify its similarities and differences, and examine its relevance from the perspective of legal justice. This study is normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The results show that Indonesia provides protection for heirs of different religions through the development of the concept of wasiat wajibah based on Supreme Court jurisprudence. Conversely, Egypt and Morocco continue to maintain the prohibition on inheritance between different religions and do not expand the application of wasiat wajibah to non-Muslim heirs, but provide a bequest mechanism as a means of transferring assets to parties who are barred from inheriting. From the perspective of legal justice, these differences indicate variations in approaches to protecting the economic interests of family members without eliminating the basic principles of Islamic inheritance. The conclusion of this study affirms that wasiat wajibah can function as a legal protection instrument for heirs of different religions without negating the principle prohibiting inheritance between different religions in Islamic law. These findings contribute to the development of Islamic inheritance law reform that is more responsive to the dynamics of plural society.
Pergeseran Hukum Waris Islam bagi Ahli Waris Non-Muslim: Studi Indonesia dan Malaysia Andiyah Farodisa; Abd. Rouf
AHKAM Vol 5 No 3 (2026): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10931

Abstract

Although Islamic inheritance law for non-Muslim heirs has received attention in various previous studies, research that specifically discusses shifts in Indonesian jurisprudence and compares them with the Malaysian legal system remains limited. This study aims to analyze the shift in Islamic inheritance law for non-Muslim heirs in Indonesia and compare it with legal regulations in Malaysia. This study used a qualitative approach with a normative legal research design through conceptual, statutory, case, and comparative legal approaches. Data were collected through a literature review of classical Islamic jurisprudence, the Compilation of Islamic Law, Supreme Court decisions, Malaysian regulations, and related literature, and were then analyzed descriptively and analytically. The results show that Indonesia has experienced a shift in legal practice through the jurisprudence of obligatory bequests without positioning non-Muslim heirs as direct heirs. In contrast to Indonesia, Malaysia places greater emphasis on the normative-institutional separation between Muslim and non-Muslim inheritance law. These findings broaden the understanding of the flexibility of Islamic inheritance law in plural societies. The conclusion of this study affirms that obligatory bequests serve as an instrument of family justice in the context of religious differences, although normative strengthening is still needed to ensure legal certainty. The implications of this study provide a theoretical contribution to the development of Islamic inheritance law studies and practical implications for the formulation of Islamic family law policies that are more responsive to the realities of plural societies.
Co-Authors Al Awshat, Muhammad Ali Andiyah Farodisa Moh. Umar Fadlil Muhammad Danias Salsabila Nadya Artika Maulani Syaikhoni