Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Collegium Studiosum Journal
Sendias, Nungky
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS DAMPAK FEEDBACK FREAMING MEDIA SOSIAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM BAGI NITIZEN DALAM KASUS VIRALNYA PEMKOT SURABAYA SIDAK PERUSAHAAN TAHAN IJAZAH KARYAWAN Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap; Khalimi; Sendias, Nungky
The Juris Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v9i1.1667

Abstract

The existence of media, both mass media and social media, has recently resulted in a very important role in influencing public opinion and is even considered as a media that will open all information that actually occurs in Indonesia and even in the world. There are many mass media and social media used as tools by political elites to influence public views on framing images for both personal and group image interests. Even the difference between the two is that social media has a more capable scope for the implementation of this function. Social media will play a greater role because with the existence of a container to accommodate freedom of opinion, netizens can freely provide feedback on their views as a reaction to the news that is rolling so that it increasingly shows the direction of various netizen reactions and increasingly emphasizes the direction of the reaction in the form of comments, uploads, reactions from other people's opinions and even influences real actions in the real world. Social media can shape our views on various issues that are rolling. One way that is often used by social media is by the way they "package" the news, which in simple terms is called "framing." Media framing can greatly influence the way we view an issue with the access that every social media user can obtain and can leave a trail of opinions written on the basis of freedom of speech.
TINJAUAN KONSTITUSIONAL PASAL 27A UU ITE TERKAIT KRITIK PUBLIK: PROBLEMATIKA FRASA 'ORANG LAIN' DAN PERLINDUNGAN KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT DI RUANG DIGITAL Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap; Sendias, Nungky
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i2.2029

Abstract

Law continually evolves in response to social developments within society; as a result, its norms often become counterproductive in their enforcement. This study employs a normative legal research method through a literature review to examine and conclude the following: this review synthesizes constitutional law research analyzing Article 27A of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), with a particular focus on the phrase “another person” (orang lain) and its implications for freedom of expression in the digital sphere. The analysis seeks to address legal ambiguity and its impact on digital rights in Indonesia. Accordingly, the provision is evaluated through relevant Constitutional Court decisions concerning the phrase “another person,” assessing judicial and doctrinal responses to restrictions on freedom of expression, examining compliance with human rights standards, analyzing the consistency of law enforcement, and exploring prospects for legal reform. The findings reveal persistent ambiguity in the phrase “another person,” resulting in multiple interpretations and legal uncertainty, despite judicial efforts to narrow the scope of defamation to individuals. While these efforts enhance legal clarity and reduce arbitrary enforcement, the provision is deemed conditionally unconstitutional and lacking binding legal force insofar as it is not interpreted to mean “excluding government institutions, groups of persons with specific or identifiable identities, institutions, corporations, professions, or public offices.
Co-Authors Khalimi Timbo Mangaranap Sirait