Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Protection of the Economic Rights of the Licensee for the Activities of Watching Together Without Permission Muhamad Akmal Jamalullail; Irvan Fauzan; Harmono; Moh Sigit Gunawan
Indonesian Journal of Business Analytics Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/ijba.v5i3.14499

Abstract

Economic rights in the Copyright Law Number 28 of 2014 expressly protect the potential income from cinematographic works, including football broadcasts. The practice of illegal watching, especially commercial ones, directly violates the exclusive rights of copyright owners and broadcasting rights to economically utilize their works through performances and communication to the public.   Football broadcasts as cinematographic works are protected by copyright, and commercial broadcasting without a permit violates the economic rights of the creator/copyright holder and broadcasting rights, potentially subject to criminal sanctions and/or fines. The protection of the financial rights of the broadcasting rights licensee is based on exclusive rights.The research uses a normative juridical method by examining Law Number 28 of 2014, finding that various regulations regulate the enforcement of economic rights violations.  To protect the economic rights of football broadcasters from illegal piracy, strategic steps include raising public and business awareness of economic losses due to copyright infringement, firm and consistent law enforcement, providing legal piracy solutions through affordable commercial licensing schemes, and strengthening international cooperation to eradicate cross-border piracy.
Protection of Models Due to Defaults in Agreements in the Modeling Industry Wafa Az-Zahra; Tiara Sakinah Najat; Nursyifa; Moh Sigit Gunawan; Raden Handiriono
Indonesian Journal of Business Analytics Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/ijba.v5i3.14556

Abstract

A work agreement between a modeling agency and a talent model is a contract that regulates the rights and obligations of both parties. However, agencies often make mistakes, including paying the talent model late.  This study aims to examine the types of defaults that often occur in modeling agreements and the legal protection that can be provided to the model as an aggrieved party.  Using a normative juridical approach and looking at the practice of agreements and court rulings in this industry, it was found that legal protection of the model is still lacking.  This is due to poor contract clauses, poor understanding of the model, and lack of oversight from the relevant agencies. Therefore, regulations must be improved to protect the model from infringement, and fairer agreements are needed. Article 1243 of the Civil Code (Civil Code) states that the guilty party must pay the aggrieved party. Suppose the modeling agency is late in paying the talent model's salary. In that case, they are responsible for promptly paying according to the contract, paying the model's losses, paying a fine if there is a penalty clause, and facing legal consequences if the delay causes negative impacts.