Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Harmonisasi Hukum Waris Islam, Hukum Adat dan Hukum Nasional Telaah Normatif terhadap Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Hukum Adat dan KUHPerdata Salas, Maizidah; Wardani, Susilo; Suroso, Teguh
JURNAL PENELITIAN SERAMBI HUKUM Vol 18 No 02 (2025): Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Vol 18 No 02 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59582/sh.v18i02.1339

Abstract

The inheritance system in Indonesia is governed by three main legal frameworks: Islamic law, customary (adat) law, and national law. Each of these systems has its own unique characteristics and principles of distribution. This study aims to explore how Islamic inheritance law, customary law, and national inheritance law in Indonesia are harmonized with one another and how inheritance distribution is regulated under these three legal systems. The research method used in this study is normative juridical, focusing on the applicable legal provisions. The findings indicate that the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) stipulates inheritance distribution based on Sharia principles, granting a larger share to male heirs. In contrast, customary law emphasizes cultural values and diverse kinship systems, while the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata) provides a more formal and balanced distribution between male and female heirs. Although these three systems operate concurrently, they are not always harmonious, requiring legislative efforts and jurisprudence to align inheritance regulations in order to achieve social justice and legal certainty amidst Indonesia’s legal pluralism.
The Legal Politics of Protecting Migrant Workers’ Human Rights: Policy Reorientation through the Revision of Law Number 18 of 2017 Salas, Maizidah; Wardani, Susilo
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v18i1.13687

Abstract

Ideally, the protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers (IMWs), as mandated by the 1945 Constitution and Law Number 18 of 2017 on the Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers (PPMI Law), positions the state as the primary human rights–based protector. In reality, persistent cases of violence, exploitation, human trafficking, and the failure of the zero-cost placement scheme reveal a significant gap caused by regulatory disharmony and overlapping institutional authority, particularly following the establishment of the Ministry of Indonesian Migrant Workers Protection (KP2MI). This study addresses the research gap (novelty) by examining the PPMI Law through a political law perspective that integrates human rights principles, institutional transformation of KP2MI–BP2MI, and comparative best practices from the Philippines. This research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that although the PPMI Law is normatively responsive, its implementation is weakened by the regulator–operator dilemma, inadequate supervision of private placement agencies, and limited responsiveness to emerging challenges such as online scamming and non-procedural migrant workers. This study recommends a revision of the PPMI Law to reaffirm institutional authority, strengthen substantive human rights protection, and adopt state-centered progressive protection models.