Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Rekonstruksi Peran Apresiasi Dan Kritik Sastra Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Karya: Tinjauan Kritis Atas Praktik Dan Teori Dian Harahap; Eny Sihite; Lusinda Sigiro; Rotua Lumbantoruan; Talenta Sembiring; Yesika Simbolon
Semantik : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): August: Semantik : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya
Publisher : Asosiasi Periset Bahasa Sastra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/semantik.v3i3.1805

Abstract

This critically discusses the role of literary appreciation and criticism in enhancing the quality of literary works by thoroughly reviewing existing practices and theories. Through a qualitative analysis approach, this study highlights how appreciation and criticism not only function as passive responses to works but also as active instruments that shape the quality and innovation of literature. This paper recommends the reconstruction of a more integrated and reflective paradigm of literary appreciation and criticism to significantly contribute to the improvement of literary quality.
Analisis Tindak Tutur Bahasa Mahasiswa dalam Interaksi Akademik dan Sosial Dian Harahap; Eny Sihite; Lusinda Sigiro; Rotua Lumbantoruan; Talenta Sembiring; Wahyudi Rambe; Yesika Simbolon; M. Oky Fardian Gafari
Pragmatik : Jurnal Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa dan Pendidikan  Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): April: Pragmatik : Jurnal Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa dan Pendidikan
Publisher : Asosiasi Periset Bahasa Sastra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/pragmatik.v3i2.1607

Abstract

This study analyzes speech acts used by students in academic and social interactions. Speech acts are part of pragmatic studies that describe how language is used in everyday communication. This study aims to identify the forms, functions, and differences in the characteristics of speech acts in both contexts. The methods used in this study include observation, interviews, recording, transcription, and literature review by analyzing various relevant literature. The results of the study indicate that in academic interactions, students more often use representative and directive speech acts to convey information and give instructions, while in social interactions, they use more expressive and commissive speech acts to build relationships and express emotions. Factors that influence these differences include the context of the situation, relationships with interlocutors, the influence of media and technology, and cultural background. The conclusion of this study confirms that understanding speech acts is very important in improving the effectiveness of student communication in both academic and social environments. The implications of this study can be used to develop better communication strategies in higher education environments and increase students' awareness of the use of appropriate language in various contexts.