Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al Maqashidi : Jurnal Hukum Islam Nusantara DISCOURSE : Indonesian Journal of Social Studies and Education
Widodo, Adellia Mahardhika
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
IMPLEMENTASI DISPENSASI KAWIN PASCA PERUBAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN (STUDI PERMOHONAN DISPENSASI KAWIN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KLATEN) Widodo, Adellia Mahardhika; Niken Wahyuning Retno Mumpuni
Al Maqashidi : Jurnal Hukum Islam Nusantara Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Al Maqashidi : Jurnal Hukum Islam Nusantara
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS NAHDLATUL ULAMA SUNAN GIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32665/almaqashidi.v8i1.5025

Abstract

Perubahan batas usia minimal perkawinan melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 merupakan langkah progresif untuk melindungi hak anak dan menekan angka perkawinan usia dini. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji implementasi dispensasi kawin pasca perubahan UU tersebut di Pengadilan Agama Klaten, dengan fokus pada tren permohonan, dasar  hakim hakim, dan efektivitasnya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum empiris dengan pendekatan socio-legal, pendekatan sosiologis, dan studi kasus. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara dengan hakim serta studi kepustakaan, kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun terjadi penurunan jumlah permohonan dispensasi kawin, namun tingkat pengabulannya tetap tinggi, dengan alasan dominan berupa kehamilan di luar nikah. Upaya seperti syarat rekomendasi psikolog belum efektif menjadikan dispensasi sebagai pengecualian yang ketat. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa dispensasi kawin belum sepenuhnya efektif mencegah perkawinan anak, sehingga diperlukan penguatan regulasi, sinergi lintas sektor, dan edukasi masyarakat agar dispensasi benar-benar berfungsi sebagai perlindungan darurat, bukan celah hukum.  
ANALISIS PENERAPAN RULE OF LAW OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI SEBAGAI THE GUARDIAN OF CONSTITUTION (Studi Kasus Putusan MK Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023) Fiqih, Pramesti Ratu; Widodo, Adellia Mahardhika; Firdaus, Anisa Miftahul
DISCOURSE: Indonesian Journal of Social Studies and Education Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): July
Publisher : Citra Media Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69875/djosse.v1i3.126

Abstract

The issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 reaped the pros and cons from various parties. The Constitutional Court's Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 contains elements of intervention outside the judiciary and/or personal interests, thus raising big questions about the independence of the exercise of judicial power by the Constitutional Court. Indonesia applies the principle of the Rule of Law and encourages law enforcement which not only guarantees formal rights but also guarantees justice in real life for everyone. However, Indonesian law has not been fully able to become a rule of social justice, because law enforcement officers and legal issues are closely related to the ethics of law enforcement and the community itself. This research uses a normative legal research type, where the author uses a case approach, where the author uses an inkracht court decision and a statute approach. The results of this study explained that the issuance of the Constitutional Court decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 was not in line with the principles of the Rule of Law, because it was felt that the decision removed the nickname of the Constitutional Court as The Guardian Of the constitutions. The decision is considered destructive to the constitution because it reaps the pros and cons in society, they think that the Constitution becomes a political container. the application of the Rule of Law principle by constitutional judges is very important to maintain justice, integrity, and public trust in the legal system. If the judge's decision is not in accordance with the Rule of Law, various negative consequences can occur, including erosion of public trust, injustice, legal uncertainty, abuse of power, human rights violations, obstacles to legal reform, and social and political instability. Therefore, it is important to ensure that MK judges work independently, transparently, accountable, and based on clear and fair legal principles.
Co-Authors Fiqih, Pramesti Ratu Firdaus, Anisa Miftahul Niken Wahyuning Retno Mumpuni