Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Restatement terhadap Unsur Perencanaan dalam Pasal 340 KUHP Arifin Andiwewang; Moonti, Roy Marthen; Ahmad, Ibrahim
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v2i3.992

Abstract

Article 340 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) regulates the crime of premeditated murder, which is characterized by the element of “with prior planning”. This element serves as the principal distinction between ordinary murder and premeditated murder. However, in judicial practice, this element is often interpreted inconsistently by judges, potentially resulting in disparities in verdicts and injustice in criminal adjudication. This research aims to restate and clarify the meaning of “prior planning” in Article 340 KUHP to promote a more consistent and fair application of the law. The research employs a normative juridical approach by analyzing a number of court decisions from the Kotamobagu District Court related to premeditated murder cases. The theoretical framework includes sentencing theory as the grand theory, legal interpretation theory as the middle theory, and criminal responsibility theory as the applied theory. The findings reveal inconsistencies in how judges assess the element of “planning”, particularly regarding the psychological state of the perpetrator and the existence of a cooling-down period between intention and execution. Based on these findings, a more explicit and standardized formulation of the term “prior planning” is necessary to ensure proportional legal enforcement, legal certainty, and substantive justice in applying Article 340 KUHP.
Rekonstruksi Hak Akses Advokat terhadap Berkas Perkara dalam Kuhap 2025 Berbasis Teori Dua Kaki Keadilan Arifin Andiwewang; Ibrahim Ahmad; Robby W. Amu
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3138

Abstract

This research is motivated by the importance of improving the professionalism of Satbrimob in riot control so that its actions remain firm, legal, proportional, accountable, and respectful of human rights. The objectives of this study are to analyze the regulations and existing conditions of the riot control capabilities of Satbrimob personnel, identify factors that hinder professionalism, and formulate an ideal and implementable capability development strategy.The type of research used is empirical juridical research with a socio-legal research approach, conducted through library research, interviews, limited observation, and normative-qualitative analysis.The results of the study indicate that the legal basis and standard operating procedures for riot control are relatively strong; however, their implementation has not been optimal due to the gap between regulations and field practices. The main obstacles include legal, institutional, human resource, infrastructure, and organizational culture aspects.The required strategies include realistic scenario-based training, strengthening field leadership, modernizing non-lethal equipment, improving tactical communication, and conducting continuous evaluation. This study recommends that Satbrimob strengthen human rights-based training, emotional control, cross-functional coordination, and a humanistic organizational culture so that riot control can be carried out professionally and gain public trust.