Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Sangadji, Sulastri
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Politik Hukum Dalam Perumusan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Sangadji, Sulastri; Melinda, Ami Cintia; Satria, Najib; Febrianti, Ni Made Regina
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 22, No 1 (2025): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - April (2025)
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v22i1.1301

Abstract

Pemerintah Indonesia melakukan pembaharuan dan penyempurnaan peraturan perundang-undangan yang dilakukan untuk mencapai kesesuaian dengan kondisi sosial dan kebutuhan bangsa. Salah satunya adalah pembaharuan dan penyempurnaan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Sebelumnya Indonesia menganut KUHP produk kolonial Belanda. Sekarang telah disahkan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP (UU KUHP) yang merupakan produk asli Indonesia. Pembaharuan ini di landasi oleh semangat dekolonisasi. Tapi dalam proses pembentukan, UU KUHP menuai banyak kontroversi. Pengaturan tentang penghinaan presiden, penghinaan lembaga negara, dan pidana terpidana korupsi menjadi poin yang krusial. Perumusan UU KUHP tidak terlepas dari unsur politik hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui unsur politik hukum dalam proses perumusan UU KUHP. Penelitian hukum normatif menjadi jenis penelitian dalam penulisan ini. Fokus penelitian ini tertuju pada norma hukum positif berupa peraturan perundang-undangan. Metode pengumpulan data menggunakan data sekunder. Pendekatan yang digunakan penulis adalah pendekatan undang-undang (statue approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian mendapati bahwa perumusan UU KUHP belum memenuhi unsur politik hukum secara ideal. Karena produk hukum yang terkandung dalam KUHP tidak hanya berakhir dari sebuah UU tersebut telah diumumkan dalam suatu lembar negara. Justru pada saat itu akan muncul persoalan baik persoalan yang telah diperkirakan atapun yang belum pernah diprediksi.
The Intervention of Government in Rector Selection and Its Impact on Academic Freedom in Higher Education Institutions Rizqiyanto, Naufal; Sangadji, Sulastri; Hendrawan, Rikki
Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law
Publisher : CV. Pustaka Parawali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71239/jicl.v2i2.62

Abstract

Regulation of the Minister of Research, Technology, and Higher Education (Permenristekdikti) No. 19/2017 on the Appointment and Dismissal of Leaders of State Universities indicates that the Minister of Education and Culture holds 35% voting rights to elect rectors, while the university senate holds 65% voting rights. This percentage is prone to emasculating the majority vote in universities. It has an impact on the rise of high-level lobbying ahead of the rector selection, both to political parties and to the Palace. This kind of practice undermines the independence of state universities in channelling aspirations to address the state's social issues. This research contributes to the analysis of the dynamics of rector selections in Indonesia, examining the impact of government intervention on rector independence and freedom of speech, and proposing an ideal regulatory framework based on transparency, meritocracy, and autonomy. It fills a gap in existing studies by highlighting how ministerial voting rights affect academic freedom and offering a reform-oriented model for more democratic and independent university leadership. This research is a normative juridical study that employs statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches to address the problem. The results showed that, first, government intervention in the selection of rectors is problematic in a democratic country, Second, government intervention in the selection of rectors has a significant effect on the independence of freedom of higher education in responding to social issues of state, Third, Changing the provisions of government intervention in the selection of rectors in State Universities by emphasizing transparency aspects, meritocracy and independence.
Co-Authors Febrianti, Ni Made Regina Hendrawan, Rikki Melinda, Ami Cintia Rizqiyanto, Naufal Satria, Najib