Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal RESLAJ: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal Jurnal Studi Bahasa dan Sastra Arab
Ridwan Agustiawan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Wacana Representasi Budaya dan Ideologi dalam Film Wadjda (2012) Pendekatan Semiotika Roland Barthes Ridwan Agustiawan
AL MA'ANY Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): AL MA'ANY: JURNAL STUDI BAHASA DAN SASTRA
Publisher : Program Studi Bahasa dan Sastra Arab Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Mandailing Natal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56874/almaany.v3i2.2116

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the film Wadjda (2012) through discourse analysis using Roland Barthes' semiotic perspective. Wadjda, directed by Haifaa al-Mansour, is a Saudi Arabian film that tells the story of a young girl named Wadjda who strives to own a bicycle as a symbol of freedom and rebellion against prevailing social norms. Using Barthes' semiotic approach, this research examines the signs and symbols present in the film to uncover the meanings embedded in its visual and narrative elements. In the semiotic context, the analysis utilizes two levels of interpretation: the denotative level (literal meaning) and the connotative level (deeper or implied meaning). Key elements analyzed include the characters, objects (such as the bicycle), and the setting, all of which reflect the social and cultural structures of Saudi Arabia, particularly concerning gender roles, freedom, and women's position in society. Through the deconstruction of these signs, this study reveals how the film portrays contradictions within a patriarchal society and how these representations provoke critical reflection on existing norms. The findings show that Wadjda functions not only as an individual story about personal achievement but also as a critique of social injustices and gender restrictions in Saudi society. By employing Barthes' semiotic theory, the film uncovers how hidden meanings can be deconstructed to understand the relationship between cultural texts and the underlying social ideologies. This study contributes to the understanding of how film media can serve as an effective tool for social critique.
Analisis Wacana Representasi Budaya dan Ideologi dalam Film Wadjda (2012) Pendekatan Semiotika Roland Barthes Ridwan Agustiawan
AL MA'ANY Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): AL MA'ANY: JURNAL STUDI BAHASA DAN SASTRA
Publisher : Program Studi Bahasa dan Sastra Arab Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Mandailing Natal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56874/almaany.v3i2.2116

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the film Wadjda (2012) through discourse analysis using Roland Barthes' semiotic perspective. Wadjda, directed by Haifaa al-Mansour, is a Saudi Arabian film that tells the story of a young girl named Wadjda who strives to own a bicycle as a symbol of freedom and rebellion against prevailing social norms. Using Barthes' semiotic approach, this research examines the signs and symbols present in the film to uncover the meanings embedded in its visual and narrative elements. In the semiotic context, the analysis utilizes two levels of interpretation: the denotative level (literal meaning) and the connotative level (deeper or implied meaning). Key elements analyzed include the characters, objects (such as the bicycle), and the setting, all of which reflect the social and cultural structures of Saudi Arabia, particularly concerning gender roles, freedom, and women's position in society. Through the deconstruction of these signs, this study reveals how the film portrays contradictions within a patriarchal society and how these representations provoke critical reflection on existing norms. The findings show that Wadjda functions not only as an individual story about personal achievement but also as a critique of social injustices and gender restrictions in Saudi society. By employing Barthes' semiotic theory, the film uncovers how hidden meanings can be deconstructed to understand the relationship between cultural texts and the underlying social ideologies. This study contributes to the understanding of how film media can serve as an effective tool for social critique.
الحيل وتطبيقاتها في المعاملات المالية المعاصرة بيع الوفاء نموذجا (دراسة فقهية تحليلية لفتوى الهيئة الشرعية الوطنية لمجلس العلماء الإندونيسي ومجمع الفقه الإسلامي الدولي بشأن اتفاقية إعادة الشراء (الريبو) كتطبيق بيع الوفاء المعاصر) Ridwan Agustiawan; Trisiladi Supriyanto; Hari Susanto
Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): RESLAJ: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/reslaj.v7i3.6658

Abstract

This study aims to analyze ḥiyal within the framework of contemporary financial transactions, with a focus on bayʿ al-wafā as an applied model. It also sheds light on the fatwas issued by the National Sharia Board of the Indonesian Council of Ulama (DSN-MUI) and the International Islamic Fiqh Academy (IIFA) regarding repurchase agreements as a contemporary application of bayʿ al-wafā . The research adopts an inductive, analytical, and comparative methodology. The study concluded with several key findings, most notably that the disagreement among jurists regarding the use of ḥiyal is primarily verbal. They unanimously agree on the criterion by which ḥiyal is classified as permissible or impermissible: its alignment or conflict with the principles of Islamic law. The disagreement lies in categorizing specific cases under either category, which varies from one case to another. Additionally, the study found that repurchase agreements closely resemble bayʿ al-wafā with no significant differences between them. Both transactions, in reality, represent interest-bearing loans riba , as the sales and purchases involved are not genuine. Thus, they are prohibited because they serve as a stratagem to circumvent riba. The study further highlights that both the National Sharia Board (DSN-MUI) and the International Islamic Fiqh Academy (IIFA) agree on the necessity of aligning repurchase agreements with the principles of Islamic law. However, they differ in their rulings. The DSN-MUI permits such agreements, provided they adhere to specific conditions outlined in its fatwa, while the IIFA prohibits them, considering them transactions tainted with riba ambiguity. The primary difference lies in the methodology of ijtihad and the application of Shariah principles within the context of repurchase agreements.
Co-Authors Hari Susanto Trisiladi Supriyanto