Najwa Aulia Nabila
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Merek Terkenal Dari Tindakan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat di Era Digital Mahali Soelianegara, Raden Naila Nadira Mahali Soelianegara; Najwa Aulia Nabila
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Juni : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu (JIMI)
Publisher : CV. Denasya Smart Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69714/h2x6s007

Abstract

This research investigates the legal protection afforded to well-known trademarks against unfair competition in the digital era.  The proliferation of e-commerce and online platforms has created new challenges for trademark protection, with instances of infringement, counterfeiting, and other forms of unfair competition becoming increasingly prevalent.  This study aims to analyze the adequacy of existing Indonesian legal frameworks, including the Trademark Law and the Law on Prohibition of Monopoly and Unfair Business Competition, in addressing these challenges.  Employing a qualitative research method involving legal doctrinal analysis and case studies of relevant court decisions, the study examines the effectiveness of current legal mechanisms in protecting well-known trademarks online.  The findings reveal gaps in the legal framework and suggest areas for improvement, such as enhanced enforcement mechanisms and regulations specifically tailored to the digital environment.  The conclusion emphasizes the need for a more robust and adaptable legal framework to effectively safeguard well-known trademarks in the dynamic landscape of digital commerce
IMPLIKASI PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA ATAS OBJEK YANG MASIH DALAM STATUS KREDIT (KPR) PASCA PERCERAIAN Najwa Aulia Nabila; Fitria Agustin
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): April : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu (JIMI)
Publisher : CV. Denasya Smart Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69714/1dy6jc15

Abstract

Disputes over joint property in the form of an outstanding mortgage often give rise to legal complexities at the intersection of family law and security law. This study aims to analyze the legal status and mechanisms for the division of mortgage properties following divorce, as well as the legal implications regarding the bank’s position as a preferred creditor. The research method employed is normative legal analysis using a statutory approach and a review of judicial decisions. The results of the study indicate that the mortgage property constitutes joint property encompassing both assets and liabilities, where its division cannot be separated from the remaining debt and the attached security rights. Based on SEMA No. 3 of 2018, a claim regarding joint property involving an asset still under mortgage without involving the bank will be declared “Not Acceptable” (Niet Ontvankelijk Verklaard). In conclusion, judges must apply the “Net Value” approach in adjudicating cases to ensure justice for former spouses without infringing upon the bank’s right of preference. Synchronization through subjective novation or the bank’s involvement as a Co-Defendant is an absolute requirement to ensure the judgment is enforceable and does not pose a risk of non-performing loans.