Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Automatic Assessment System: Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Laporan Harta Kekayaan Penyelenggara Negara (LHKPN) Melalui Machine Learning Rachma Ananda Sulaiman; Afanin Fariq Fajriya; Muhammad Yahya Widiana
Jurnal Restorasi Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Restorasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/adgzvf16

Abstract

State administrators' wealth reports (LHKPN) play an important role in realizing transparency and accountability of the Indonesian government. In reality, the implementation of LHKPN has not been optimal. Therefore, it is urgent to restructure the LHKPN in order to realize a modern democracy. This scientific paper is juridical-normative research using statutory, comparative and conceptual approaches. The data used in this paper is secondary data. The results of this paper shows that; (i) LHKPN is one of the pillars of transparency because part of public monitoring tool, but faces problems in the juridical, technical, and institutional fields; (ii) the successful implementation of the automatic assessment system (AAS) in South Africa, Australia, and France has become a comparison with real solutions for optimizing ASS in Indonesia; and (iii) the ideal construction for implementing ASS which will be regulated in Government Regulations and implemented through the Directorate Agency for LHKPN auditing in Indonesia. Laporan harta kekayaan penyelenggara negara (LHKPN) berperan penting dalam mewujudkan transparansi dan akuntabilitas pemerintah Indonesia. Kualitas unsur tersebut berimplikasi pada indeks demokrasi modern Indonesia. Kenyataannya, penerapan LHKPN di status quo belum maksimal. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan restrukturisasi LHKPN yang mampu mewujudkan demokrasi modern yang berkeadilan. Karya tulis ilmiah ini merupakan penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, perbandingan, dan konseptual. Data yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah data sekunder. Hasil dari tulisan ini menunjukkan bahwa; (i) LHKPN merupakan salah satu tonggak transparansi karena menjadi alat pengawas masyarakat, tetapi menghadapi permasalahan dalam bidang yuridis, teknis, dan kelembagaan; (ii) keberhasilan penerapan automatic assessment system (AAS) di Afrika Selatan, Australia, dan Prancis telah menjadi perbandingan dengan solusi nyata optimalisasi ASS di Indonesia; dan (iii) diperoleh konstruksi ideal penerapan ASS yang akan diatur dalam regulasi berbentuk Peraturan Pemerintah dan dijalankan melalui lembaga Direktorat PP LHKPN selaku penanggung jawab pemeriksa LHKPN di Indonesia.
THE COMPARISON OF BLUE CARBON CREDIT REGULATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION IN INDONESIA, KENYA, MADAGASCAR, AND AUSTRALIA Rahmah Salsabilla; Afanin Fariq Fajriya; Rachma Ananda Sulaiman
Progressive Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): NOVEMBER 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law-Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/prolev.v7i2.296

Abstract

Global climate change has become an increasingly urgent environmental issue, driven in part by the continuous degradation of forest ecosystems worldwide. Forests, which function as major global carbon sinks, are frequently converted for economic and social purposes, resulting in declining forest cover and rising carbon emissions. This situation highlights the necessity of innovative approaches to address climate-related challenges, including the conservation and enhancement of Blue Carbon Ecosystems (BCE). BCEs, particularly mangrove forests and seagrass meadows, hold substantial potential for carbon sequestration and can support environmental, social, and economic objectives when managed effectively. One mechanism developed to utilize this potential is Blue Carbon Credits (BCC). However, despite Indonesia’s vast coastal resources and high blue carbon capacity, the implementation of BCC remains underdeveloped. This study aims to examine the regulatory framework and practical progress of BCC initiatives in Indonesia and compare them with experiences from other countries. A qualitative approach was employed, using descriptive–normative analysis supported by secondary data and case studies. The findings indicate that Indonesia has significant opportunities to advance BCC initiatives, yet institutional fragmentation, overlapping authorities, and limited data integration hinder optimal implementation. Comparative insights from countries with more established blue carbon policies provide recommendations for strengthening Indonesia’s governance, improving data coordination, and enhancing the overall effectiveness of BCC implementation.