Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan Law Research Review Quarterly
Ali, La Ode Bunga
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang
Religion Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Gogoli's Punishment as a Renewal of National Death Penalty Sanctions against Immigrants Committing Narcotics Criminal Acts in the Development of Criminal Law in Indonesia (Study Period of the Buton Sultanate) Ali, La Ode Bunga; Mansyah, Muh Syutri
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol 4 No 1 (2018): L. Research Rev. Q. (February 2018) "Law Enforcement of the Control of Illegal Im
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/snh.v4i01.25557

Abstract

At present, the Indonesian state is experiencing an unresolved narcotics problem. Various efforts to eradicate and prevent narcotics have been made, but they have not caused a deterrent effect in law enforcement. There are difficulties in eradicating at its roots, it is one of the obstacles experienced by our law enforcement officers, in this study using a normative juridical research method with a historical approach, a conceptual approach that has examined traditional criminal sanctions that were in force during the Buton Sultanate. and obstacles in the implementation of gogoli punishment. The results of this study indicate that the renewal of the national criminal law in relation to criminal sanctions can be sourced from customary law in effect in the Sultanate of Buton as intended is the gogoli punishment, while the concept of imposing a gogoli sentence is a rope wrapped around the body of the person sentenced and pulled in a way that the opposite direction until the endurance of his body lost or death, the sentence is included in the type of death sentence, this is relevant to immigrants who commit narcotics crime in Indonesia who have been sentenced several times to death sentence but apparently until now it still has no effect, the authors have the hope that the sentence can be applied nationally given the narcotics crime that occurred in almost all regions and will damage the morale of the nation's children today.
Menghilangkan Alat Bukti oleh Penyidik Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Obstruction Of Justice Mansyah, Muh Sutri; Ali, La Ode Bunga
Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan Vol. 18 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bone

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/ekspose.v18i2.487

Abstract

Abstract: This article aims to find out and analyze the elimination of evidence by corruption investigators as an attempt to obstruction of justice, here the author uses normative juridical research with a legal approach and a case approach, this is motivated by every case of corruption from the process of investigation, investigation, prosecution, examination in the court, to the verdict and implementation of the verdict. as it is a process in the criminal justice system, a case can be followed up based on at least 2 (two) evidence, but problems arise if it turns out that the evidence is allegedly removed by the investigator, the question will arise whether by removing the evidence by the investigator as an obstruction effort of justice, the results of the study that removing evidence could include efforts to obstruction of justice which are acts of crime and investigators must be criminally responsible according to Article 21 of Act No. 20 of 2001 amendment to Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts Corruption.Abstrak: Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis mengenai menghilangkan alat bukti oleh penyidik tindak pidana korupsi sebagai upaya obstruction of justice, disini penulis menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, hal ini dilatar belakangi setiap kasus tindak pidana korupsi tentunya akan dimulai dari proses penyelidikan, penyidikan, penuntutan, pemeriksaan di pengadilan, sampai penjatuhan vonis dan pelaksanaan putusan. sebagaimana hal tersebut merupakan proses dalam sistem peradilan pidana, suatu kasus dapat ditindak lanjuti berdasarkan minimal 2 (dua) alat bukti, namun muncul permasalahan jika ternyata alat bukti diduga dihilangkan oleh penyidik, maka akan timbul pertanyaan apakah dengan menghilangkan alat bukti oleh penyidik sebagai upaya obstruction of justice, maka hasil penelitian bahwa menghilangkan  alat bukti dapat termasuk upaya obstruction of justice yang merupakan perbuatan tindak pidana dan penyidik harus bertangungjawab secara pidana menurut pasal 21 Undang-Undang No 20 Tahun 2001 perubahan atas Undang-Undang No 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Co-Authors Mansyah, Muh Syutri Muh Sutri Mansyah