Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Enhancing community consensus in Oman tourism: A communication approach Tripathi, Sangeeta
Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Vol 13, No 1 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/jkk.v13i1.61174

Abstract

Background: As the world pays increasing attention to innovations in the tourism sector, this study will examine how local communities respond to such innovations, particularly in Oman, which is diversifying its economy through tourism. This study highlights several factors influencing stakeholders’ acceptance of innovative tourism, including local communities, businesses, and tourism students. Purpose: This study aimed to identify the determinants of whether tourism enterprises adopt innovative practices and effective communication strategies to diffuse information and create awareness regarding creative tourism. Methods: The current study employed a quantitative methodological approach based on data gathered from 533 respondents representing a cross-section of tourism industry stakeholders. Results: The findings illustrate significant considerations regarding the acceptability of Oman’s new tourism development, with a great emphasis on communication strategies. Equally, the research outlines real implications for countries interested in developing innovative tourism by highlighting a pronounced active community approach. This study was conducted in specific geographic regions, which limits the generalizability of the findings. Therefore, future studies can be performed with a broader selection of locations and stakeholder perspectives to increase the validation of the Diffusion of Innovation model for tourism contexts. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the need for community participation in tourism innovation processes. A sense of ownership creates more enthusiasm and cohesion among local stakeholders and encourages them to accept new tourism practices socially. Implications: This research strengthens community dialogue regarding tourism. This study adds to the literature on the diffusion of innovation in the tourism industry by providing empirical evidence on the adoption of innovative tourism practices.
E-Reputation in digital public spheres: Discourse network analysis of Indonesian Universities online Dipa, Adzkia Kirana; Puspitasari, Lilis; Tripathi, Sangeeta
PRofesi Humas Vol 11, No 1 (2026): August 2026
Publisher : Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/prh.v11i1.70195

Abstract

Background: E-reputation is increasingly important for the positioning of Indonesian universities in a complex landscape. The complex interplay among universities, media, and other actors in the construction of e-reputation, especially through the lens of actors’ networks and interactions, remains a rather understudied phenomenon. Purpose: The purpose of the research paper is to examine the relational positioning of Indonesia’s ten leading universities as depicted in the online media of 2024, thereby filling a gap in the understanding of the mechanisms of the construction of e-reputation. Methods: 279 online news articles related to top universities in Indonesia, such as Universitas Indonesia, UGM, ITB, etc., were analyzed through the application of Discourse Network Analysis (DNA 3.0.11), and then visualization was carried out through Visone 2.28.1. Network metrics were used to assess each university’s visibility. Result: The results show significant differences in centrality and media attention. Universitas Indonesia, UGM, and ITB are found to be the central institutions that play a crucial role as a hub during significant academic and policy events. On the other hand, other institutions are found to be peripheral. The attention from media sources such as Kompas.com and Republika.co.id centres on controversies surrounding achievements, in which students, alumni, and government actors play significant roles. Conclusion: E-reputation is not only a product of discourse networks among various actors, such as institutions and media, but also of media framing and stakeholder engagement. Implications: From this research, universities must consider how to manage their e-reputation by strategically engaging with media and stakeholders. Similarly, policymakers must consider how to incorporate e-reputation into policy and media literacy for the maintenance of reputation.