Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Notary Journal Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities
Ramadhanty, Savira
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pemberian Persetujuan yang Sah Terhadap Akta Notaris yang Dibuat oleh Difabel Tanpa Sidik Jari Ramadhanty, Savira; Budianto, Agus
Notary Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): April
Publisher : Program Studi Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/nj.v3i1.6732

Abstract

An authentic deed made by a notary has certain requirements that need to be fulfilled. The making of a notarial deed refers to Law Number 30 of 2004 as amended by Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Notary Occupation (UUJN). One of the requirements that shall be fulfilled in order that an authentic deed drawn up by a notary has perfect evidentiary power is the affixing of a signature by the appearer, this has also been regulated in Article 44 UUJN. Not affixing a signature can reduce the evidentiary power of the deed. The notary also has the responsibility of conducting the precautionary principle when assisting appearer without fingerprints in giving valid legal approval in addition to affixing signatures and fingerprints. According to interviews and legal data analyzed by the author, the affixing of the signature and fingerprint stamp can be replaced by surrogate. Surrogate is a sentence written at the end of the deed to clearly explain the reasons for not being able to affix a signature. This is also in line with Article 44 paragraph (2) UUJN. The notary also has the responsibility to apply the precautionary principle in making the surrogacy/surrogate by using clear sentence formulations and supported by a doctor's certificate from the appearer which strengthens the reasons for using the surrogate.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Sebuah akta autentik yang dibuat oleh notaris memiliki persyaratan tertentu yang perlu dipenuhi dalam pembuatannya. Pembuatan akta notaris mengacu kepada Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN). Salah satu persyaratan yang harus dipenuhi agar suatu akta autentik yang dibuat oleh notaris memiliki kekuatan pembuktian sempurna ialah dengan dibubuhkannya tanda tangan oleh penghadap, hal ini telah diatur pula dalam Pasal 44 UUJN. Tidak dibubuhkannya tanda tangan dapat menurunkan kekuatan pembuktian akta tersebut. Notaris juga memiliki tanggung jawab yaitu penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian ketika membantu penghadap tanpa sidik jari dalam memberikan persetujuan hukumnya yang sah selain pembubuhan tanda tangan dan cap sidik jari. Menurut wawancara dan data-data yang dianalisis oleh Penulis, pembubuhan tanda tangan dan cap sidik jari tersebut dapat digantikan dengan surogasi/surrogate. Surogasi/surrogate merupakan kalimat yang dituliskan pada akhir akta untuk secara jelas menerangkan alasan tidak dapat dibubuhkannya tanda tangan. Hal ini telah sejalan pula dengan Pasal 44 ayat (2) UUJN. Notaris juga memiliki tanggung jawab untuk menerapkan prinsip kehati-hatian dalam pembuatan surogasi/surrogate tersebut dengan menggunakan formulasi kalimat yang jelas serta didukung dengan adanya surat keterangan dokter dari penghadap yang menjadi menguatkan alasan digunakannya surogasi/surrogate tersebut.
Legal Certainty in The Preparation of Notarial Deeds By Appearers With Disabilities Who Are Unable to Sign Ramadhanty, Savira; Budianto, Agus; Soerodjo, Irawan
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3120

Abstract

Authentic deeds drawn up by Notaries as public officials with the authority to do so, with strict legal formalities and superior evidentiary power. In its application, the certainty of signatures and/or fingerprints by appearers with disabilities in deeds is questionable, as this has not been strictly regulated in the Law No. 30 of 2004 on Notary Position as partially amended by Law No. 2 of 2014 on Amendments to Law No. 30 of 2004 on Notary Position (“NOTARY OFFICIAL LAW”). The issues raised in this article are: How can legal certainty be ensured for persons with disabilities who are unable to sign and/or provide fingerprints before Notaries? And what is the ideal arrangement for persons with disabilities who are unable to sign and/or provide fingerprints before Notaries? The research method used is normative legal research, a type of research commonly conducted in the development of legal science, namely Legal Dogmatics ( rechtsdogmatiek ). The approach used is laws and regulations. The results of the study show that signatures cannot be affixed. According to the NOTARY OFFICIAL LAW, the reason for the inability to affix signatures must be stated clearly and explicitly at the end of the deeds. If the deeds cannot be signed and the Notaries do not provide a clear and explicit reason at the end of the deeds, this can reduce the probative value of the deeds to that of private deeds and will provide grounds for the aggrieved party to claim cancellation of deeds. Of course, rules such as these will not work if legal certainty is not incorporated into the resulting law. Furthermore, if problems arise in the future on the voidable deeds, Notaries cannot be held criminally liable simply for recording the information requested by the parties. In this regard, it is necessary to improve the regulations for implementing the provisions of Article 44 of the Notary Position Law to ensure that appearers with physical disabilities who have limited hand use can still perform legal actions before Notaries.
Co-Authors Agus Budianto Soerodjo, Irawan